Author
Listed:
- Esben Rahbek Gjerdrum Pedersen
- Linne Marie Lauesen
- Arno Kourula
Abstract
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine to what extent the conventional stakeholder model mirrors managerial perceptions of the stakeholder environment in the Swedish fashion industry. The authors aim to adopt a novel approach to stakeholder measurement, as the traditional stakeholder model is constrained by its static two-dimensional nature, which captures neither the nuances of the stakeholder literature nor the dynamics of the firm’s stakeholder universe. Design/methodology/approach - Empirically, the paper is based on findings from a survey among 492 Swedish fashion manufacturers and retailers. Findings - The paper reports significant discrepancy between the conventional stakeholder model and the perceptions of real-life managers of the stakeholder environment. On the surface, their understanding is more in line with the managerial model of the firm from which the stakeholder literature originally departs. It is argued, however, that the discrepancy may be rooted in technology rather than theory as the stakeholder model is constrained by its static two-dimensional nature, which captures neither the nuances of the stakeholder literature nor the dynamics of the firm’s stakeholder universe. The paper, therefore, introduces an animated alternative to the conventional stakeholder model that provides a richer graphical representation of a firm’s stakeholder universe. Research limitations/implications - The paper refers to the open-ended questions in the survey in terms of descriptive statistics, and not the entire quantitative measures in the survey. This is because these questions are crucial to the authors’ approach to the suggested new stakeholder model, which is not tested quantitatively, but should be perceived as explorative – as a qualitative outcome of the survey. The survey is conducted through the web in the Swedish fashion industry only; thus; the authors’ suggested model needs further quantitative qualification, which the authors plead for in future research. Originality/value - The originality of the paper is its novel approach to stakeholder measurement based on the perceptions of real-life managers of the stakeholder environment of the Swedish fashion industry. The traditional stakeholder model is constrained by its static two-dimensional nature, which the paper’s animated three-dimensional alternative provides a richer graphical representation of a firm’s stakeholder universe.
Suggested Citation
Esben Rahbek Gjerdrum Pedersen & Linne Marie Lauesen & Arno Kourula, 2017.
"Back to basics: exploring perceptions of stakeholders within the Swedish fashion industry,"
Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(2), pages 266-278, June.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:srjpps:srj-08-2016-0148
DOI: 10.1108/SRJ-08-2016-0148
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Watanabe, Chihiro & Akhtar, Waleed & Tou, Yuji & Neittaanmäki, Pekka, 2021.
"Amazon's initiative transforming a non-contact society - Digital disruptionleads the way to stakeholder capitalization,"
Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
- Thorey S Thorisdottir & Lara Johannsdottir, 2020.
"Corporate Social Responsibility Influencing Sustainability within the Fashion Industry. A Systematic Review,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-64, November.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:srjpps:srj-08-2016-0148. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.