IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/sefpps/sef-02-2024-0075.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risks of decentralized finance and their potential negative effects on capital markets: the Terra-Luna case

Author

Listed:
  • Viktor Santiago
  • Michel Charifzadeh
  • Tim Alexander Herberger

Abstract

Purpose - This study aims to investigate the impact of the 2022 collapse of the Terra-Luna ecosystem on volatility correlations among digital assets, including U.S. Terra, Luna, Bitcoin, Ether, a Decentralized Finance index and U.S.-sourced conventional assets stocks, bonds, oil, gold and the dollar index. The primary research question addresses whether correlations increased between digital and conventional assets during the collapse. Design/methodology/approach - A dynamic conditional correlation generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity model was used to examine changes in volatility correlations during the market crash. Specifically, a data set of 1,442 close prices from 30-minute interval candles of digital and conventional asset prices are considered to provide a granular view of market dynamics during the sample period from January 3rd, 2022, to May 31st, 2022, including the crash event. Findings - While the dynamic conditional correlation plots of the model indicate increased volatility, the results do not offer sufficient evidence to confirm an increase in correlations between digital and conventional assets during the Terra-Luna downfall. Furthermore, the authors confirm Bitcoin’s role as a diversifier with oil and observe the dollar index maintaining a negative correlation with Bitcoin during the crash, supporting Bitcoin’s function as a hedge against the U.S. dollar. However, the findings during the crash diverge from previous studies, reflecting shifts in correlation patterns in broader market downturns. Specifically, the authors identify the need for adaptive capital allocation strategies, as gold’s oscillation during the period suggests it may not serve as an effective hedge during black swan events. Practical implications - The findings provide insights for investors, financial institutions and regulators to improve risk management, portfolio diversification, trading strategies and the formulation of consumer protection regulations. In addition, the results underscore the challenges of mitigating risks beyond regulatory measures and emphasize the importance of exercising caution for investors. Originality/value - This study addresses the research gap in changes between conventional and digital asset volatility correlations during collapses in the digital asset space.

Suggested Citation

  • Viktor Santiago & Michel Charifzadeh & Tim Alexander Herberger, 2024. "Risks of decentralized finance and their potential negative effects on capital markets: the Terra-Luna case," Studies in Economics and Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 42(3), pages 427-448, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:sefpps:sef-02-2024-0075
    DOI: 10.1108/SEF-02-2024-0075
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/SEF-02-2024-0075/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/SEF-02-2024-0075/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/SEF-02-2024-0075?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    DeFi; Terra Luna; Market crash; Cryptocurrency; Digital assets; Volatility; G11; G18; G23;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G18 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:sefpps:sef-02-2024-0075. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.