IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/rbfpps/rbf-07-2024-0185.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Distinguishing altruism from warm glow: psychological motivations for money donations to Thailand’s Buddhist society

Author

Listed:
  • Dalina Amonhaemanon
  • Panita Khongkaew
  • Ausawatap Akartwipart
  • Nithicha Thamthanakoon

Abstract

Purpose - This study investigates the factors influencing monetary donations in Thailand, a developing Buddhist nation. We explore the interplay of demographic, socioeconomic, psychological and social factors on individual donation behavior, focusing on frequency, amount, planning and motivation. Our primary aim is to distinguish pure altruism from the “warm glow” effect and identify the optimal model explaining how donation behavior impacts donor life satisfaction. Design/methodology/approach - A structured, self-administered questionnaire surveyed 450 Thai charitable donors (convenience sample) using logistic regression analysis in SPSS Findings - The study revealed females and those with higher education exhibited stronger altruistic motives, while a warm glow motivated five distinct groups: 1) older, 2) unmarried, 3) those with high external locus of control, 4) reputation-conscious donors and 5) those aware of public health benefits like medical care access. Additionally, pre-planned donations were associated with five factors: 1) debt-free, 2) Buddhist faith, 3) belief in societal improvement through donations, 4) witnessing family members donate and 5) awareness of public health benefits including receiving royal decorations. Practical implications - This research provides valuable insights for policymakers and charities. By understanding donor motivations, targeted incentives (e.g. emphasizing the “warm glow” effect) can be designed to increase donations and address social issues. Originality/value - The study suggests tax deduction campaigns may be less effective than expected, as awareness of deductions correlated with lower donation frequency and amount. To incentivize giving, the government should focus on factors most linked to donor satisfaction. This research indicates warm glow is the strongest driver, followed by donation frequency, planning behavior and amount donated.

Suggested Citation

  • Dalina Amonhaemanon & Panita Khongkaew & Ausawatap Akartwipart & Nithicha Thamthanakoon, 2024. "Distinguishing altruism from warm glow: psychological motivations for money donations to Thailand’s Buddhist society," Review of Behavioral Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 17(1), pages 123-140, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:rbfpps:rbf-07-2024-0185
    DOI: 10.1108/RBF-07-2024-0185
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/RBF-07-2024-0185/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/RBF-07-2024-0185/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/RBF-07-2024-0185?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Money donation; Pure altruism; Warm glow; Altruistic behavior; Motivation behind donation; Behavioral economics; A14; D14; G40;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A14 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Sociology of Economics
    • D14 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Household Saving; Personal Finance
    • G40 - Financial Economics - - Behavioral Finance - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:rbfpps:rbf-07-2024-0185. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.