IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/rafpps/v7y2008i1p38-68.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discretionary behavior with respect to the adoption of SFAS no. 142 and the behavior of security prices

Author

Listed:
  • Yoonseok Zang

Abstract

Purpose - This study aims to examine whether managers use discretion in determining transitional goodwill impairment loss (initial impairment loss or IIL) upon the adoption of SFAS no. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, and whether and how the market reacts to the impairment loss and to the absence of goodwill amortization. Design/methodology/approach - Various empirical models are applied to a sample of 870 firms that completed the IIL test. Findings - It is found that more highly leveraged firms (firms that have undergone a recent management change) report lower (greater) goodwill impairment. Stock return is not associated with a boost in earnings caused by elimination of goodwill amortization, but it is negatively associated with an unexpected IIL, with the association being stronger for highly leveraged firms. Subsequently, analysts revise earnings forecasts for upcoming quarters downward in response to the unexpected IIL. Research limitations/implications - Possibility of measurement errors in proxies is a caveat. Practical implications - The findings are consistent with the strategic reduction of the goodwill impairment by management to avoid the violation of debt covenants and with the notion that new managers take a big bath so they can report higher earnings in the future. The market tests imply that unexpected IIL provides value‐relevant information about a negative view of the future profit‐making potential of the firm or an adverse impact on its debt contracts. No association with elimination of goodwill amortization can be interpreted as the market's anticipation or the lack of information content in goodwill amortization. Originality/value - This research helps better understand the importance of managers' incentives in determining IIL as well as the stock market effect of the announcement of the IIL and the exclusion of goodwill amortization.

Suggested Citation

  • Yoonseok Zang, 2008. "Discretionary behavior with respect to the adoption of SFAS no. 142 and the behavior of security prices," Review of Accounting and Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 7(1), pages 38-68, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:eme:rafpps:v:7:y:2008:i:1:p:38-68
    DOI: 10.1108/14757700810853842
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/14757700810853842/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/14757700810853842/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/14757700810853842?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Abdul Majid, Jamaliah, 2015. "Reporting incentives, ownership concentration by the largest outside shareholder, and reported goodwill impairment losses," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 199-214.
    2. Iatridis, George Emmanuel & Pappas, Kostas & Walker, Martin, 2022. "Narrative disclosure quality and the timeliness of goodwill impairments," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(2).
    3. Jani Saastamoinen & Hannu Ojala & Kati Pajunen & Pontus Troberg, 2018. "Analyst Characteristics and the Level of Critical Perception of Goodwill Accounting," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 28(4), pages 538-555, December.
    4. Nour Malijebtou Hassine & Faouzi Jilani, 2017. "Earnings Management Behavior with Respect to Goodwill Impairment Losses under IAS 36: The French Case," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 7(2), pages 177-196, April.
    5. Atanas Atanasov, 2021. "COVID-19 as a Triggering Event in the Goodwill Impairment Testing," Izvestia Journal of the Union of Scientists - Varna. Economic Sciences Series, Union of Scientists - Varna, Economic Sciences Section, vol. 10(3), pages 177-184, December.
    6. Benjamin T. Albersmann & Reiner Quick, 2020. "The Impact of Audit Quality Indicators on the Timeliness of Goodwill Impairments: Evidence from the German Setting," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 56(1), pages 66-103, March.
    7. Mohammad Ebrahim Nawaiseh, 2016. "Can Impairment Recognition under IAS 36 Be Improved by Financial Performance?," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(12), pages 163-174, December.
    8. Terry A. Baker & Thomas J. Lopez & Austin L. Reitenga & George W. Ruch, 2019. "The influence of CEO and CFO power on accruals and real earnings management," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 325-345, January.
    9. Atanasov, Atanas, 2019. "Репутацията Като Обект На Счетоводството: Признаване, Оценяване, Оповестяване [Goodwill as an accounting object: initial recognition, measurement, disclosure]," MPRA Paper 97938, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Begoña Giner & Francisca Pardo, 2015. "How Ethical are Managers’ Goodwill Impairment Decisions in Spanish-Listed Firms?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 132(1), pages 21-40, November.
    11. Atanasov, Atanas, 2017. "Управленски Аспекти На Счетоводната Обезценка На Търговската Репутация [Management Aspects of the Impairment of Goodwill]," MPRA Paper 85675, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Silvia Ferramosca & Giulio Greco & Marco Allegrini, 2017. "External audit and goodwill write-off," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 21(4), pages 907-934, December.
    13. Araceli Amorós Martínez & José Antonio Cavero Rubio, 2018. "The Economic Effects of IFRS Goodwill Reporting," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 28(3), pages 309-322, September.
    14. Jonas Oliveira & Graça Azevedo & Bertina Oliveira, 2018. "Impairment Losses: The Impact of First‐time Adoption of the Accounting Standardisation System in Portugal," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 28(4), pages 556-576, December.
    15. Atanasov, Atanas, 2018. "Фактори, Влияещи Върху Обезценката На Репутацията [Goodwill Impairment Factors]," MPRA Paper 87625, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Nicola Giuseppe Castellano & Katia Corsi & Roberto Del Gobbo, 2015. "Goodwill Disclosure in Europe. Profiles of disclosing companies," Eastern European Business and Economics Journal, Eastern European Business and Economics Studies Centre, vol. 1(2), pages 32-65.
    17. Qiang Cheng & Young Jun Cho & Holly Yang, 2018. "Financial reporting changes and the internal information environment: Evidence from SFAS 142," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 347-383, March.
    18. Jorge Pallarés Sanchidrián & Javier Pérez García & José A. Gonzalo-Angulo, 2021. "(IR) Relevance of goodwill impairment: the case of European banking (2005–2015)," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(1), pages 24-38, March.
    19. repec:eeb:15v1n2:v:1:y:2015:i:2:p:32-65 is not listed on IDEAS

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:rafpps:v:7:y:2008:i:1:p:38-68. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.