IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/rafpps/v6y2007i4p442-459.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Alternative evidence on financial analysts' use of financial statement information

Author

Listed:
  • Donal Byard
  • Fatma Cebenoyan

Abstract

Purpose - Financial analysts are frequently viewed as information intermediaries who process and interpret firms' financial reports for other market participants. Much recent research, however, has cast doubts on analysts' ability to fully utilize the information in firms' financial reports. Using an alternative approach, this study aims to provide evidence on how sophisticated analysts are at using information in firms' financial reports. Design/methodology/approach - The paper estimates different measures of firms' operational efficiency, all of which are derived from financial statement data, and compares the strength of the association between these measures and analysts' absolute forecast errors. It then compares a sophisticated frontier‐based measure of firms' operational efficiency that evaluates firms' performance relative to their competitors with three more traditional efficiency measures; specifically the return on asset (ROA) ratio, industry‐adjusted ROA, and the return on equity ratio. Findings - The results indicate that the more sophisticated frontier‐based measure is more strongly negatively associated with analysts' absolute forecast errors than the other three measures. The results thus suggest that analysts are capable of undertaking a sophisticated analysis of the information in firms' financial reports, at least as it pertains to operational efficiency. Originality/value - To the extent that analysts serve as a key group of users of financial information, these results are likely to be of interest to accounting policy makers.

Suggested Citation

  • Donal Byard & Fatma Cebenoyan, 2007. "Alternative evidence on financial analysts' use of financial statement information," Review of Accounting and Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 6(4), pages 442-459, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:eme:rafpps:v:6:y:2007:i:4:p:442-459
    DOI: 10.1108/14757700710835087
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/14757700710835087/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/14757700710835087/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/14757700710835087?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bok Baik & Joon Chae & Sunhwa Choi & David B. Farber, 2013. "Changes in Operational Efficiency and Firm Performance: A Frontier Analysis Approach," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 996-1026, September.
    2. Antonella Silvestri & Stefania Veltri, 2012. "A Test Of The Ohlson Model On The Italian Stock Exchange," Accounting & Taxation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 4(1), pages 83-94.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:rafpps:v:6:y:2007:i:4:p:442-459. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.