IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/rafpps/v12y2013i4p369-386.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of nursing quality on nursing home efficiency: evidence from Taiwan

Author

Listed:
  • Shyr-Juh Chang
  • Mei-Ai Cheng

Abstract

Purpose - – The purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of nursing quality on Taiwan nursing homes, and differences of efficiency among different management types of nursing homes. Design/methodology/approach - – This study employs data envelopment analysis (DEA) to investigate the efficiency of nursing homes with and without quality variable. The impacts of nursing quality on the efficiency of nursing homes were studied. Finally, Tobit regression is used to explore the factors influencing efficiency in nursing homes. Findings - – The analysis shows that nursing quality has significant impacts on operating efficiency of nursing homes. When quality variables are included, all efficiencies were significantly improved, except scale efficiency of government-expense nursing homes (GEH); return of scale status of GEH decrease substantially; the licensed nursing staff can always improve efficiency; higher occupancy rate increase efficiency; private-operated veteran homes performs better than government-operated homes. Practical implications - – Nursing quality has a significant effect on the efficiency measures. Thus, the nursing quality cannot be ignored in assessing the performance of nursing homes. Otherwise, it may result in biased results. The efficiencies of private-operated nursing homes are better than the government operation. Government-operated nursing homes should take private nursing homes as the benchmark. Originality/value - – The paper demonstrates the nursing quality is an important factor in the efficiency measure of nursing homes. It also shows that privatized operation has higher efficiency than the government operation.

Suggested Citation

  • Shyr-Juh Chang & Mei-Ai Cheng, 2013. "The impact of nursing quality on nursing home efficiency: evidence from Taiwan," Review of Accounting and Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(4), pages 369-386, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:eme:rafpps:v:12:y:2013:i:4:p:369-386
    DOI: 10.1108/RAF-06-2012-0058
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/RAF-06-2012-0058/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/RAF-06-2012-0058/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/RAF-06-2012-0058?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rajendra Dulal, 2018. "Technical efficiency of nursing homes: do five-star quality ratings matter?," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 393-400, September.
    2. Alice Tran & Kim-Huong Nguyen & Len Gray & Tracy Comans, 2019. "A Systematic Literature Review of Efficiency Measurement in Nursing Homes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-18, June.
    3. Shiovan Ni Luasa & Declan Dineen & Marta Zieba, 2018. "Technical and scale efficiency in public and private Irish nursing homes – a bootstrap DEA approach," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 326-347, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:rafpps:v:12:y:2013:i:4:p:369-386. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.