IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/qrampp/v11y2014i2p111-128.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accountability and governance in social care: the impact of personalisation

Author

Listed:
  • Enrico Bracci

Abstract

Purpose - – The aim of the paper is to illustrate the changing structure of accountability under a new public governance agenda introduced in England to deliver social care through personal budgets. Design/methodology/approach - – The paper draws on accountability and public governance literature, in particular, the accountability framework proposed by Hupe and Hill. The evidence was gathered from exploratory case studies conducted in two English County Councils. Findings - – The introduction of personal budgets has modified the roles of the different actors involved in the co-production of social services. The case studies evidence changes in the accountability and governance process, particularly with respect to the personal budget regime that has devolved responsibility and accountability to the customer. Specifically, the customer's role has shifted and expanded in the accountability chain and thus developed into a partnership. Originality/value - – This study is one of the first to analyse the relationship between the personalisation agenda in English social services and the relevant accountability mechanisms involved. Moreover, the paper refines the theoretical framework proposed by Hupe and Hill according to the different role the public now plays.

Suggested Citation

  • Enrico Bracci, 2014. "Accountability and governance in social care: the impact of personalisation," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(2), pages 111-128, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:eme:qrampp:v:11:y:2014:i:2:p:111-128
    DOI: 10.1108/QRAM-04-2014-0033
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/QRAM-04-2014-0033/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/QRAM-04-2014-0033/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/QRAM-04-2014-0033?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lasuli Bakalikwira & Juma Bananuka & Twaha Kaawaase Kigongo & Doreen Musimenta & Veronica Mukyala, 2017. "Accountability in the public health care systems: A developing economy perspective," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1334995-133, January.
    2. Junne, Jaromir, 2018. "Enabling accountability: An analysis of personal budgets for disabled people," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 46-62.
    3. Muhammad Khan & Hee Yong Lee & Jung Han Bae, 2019. "The Role of Transparency in Humanitarian Logistics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-27, April.
    4. repec:arp:tjssrr:2019:p:173-183 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Tuan Zainun Tuan Mat* & Nur Shahirah Adilah Mohd Sairazi & Fadzlina Mohd Fahmi & Sharifah Nazatul Faiza Syed Mustapha Nazri & Sharina Tajul Urus, 2018. "Determinants of Budgetary Slack Creation: A Study in Malaysian Local Authorities," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 1040-1050:5.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:qrampp:v:11:y:2014:i:2:p:111-128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.