IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/qrampp/v10y2013i3-4p295-315.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Purposes, activities and beneficiaries

Author

Listed:
  • Gareth G. Morgan

Abstract

Purpose - – The purpose of this paper is to outline a method developed for analysis of narrative reporting by charities concerning the carrying out of their aims for public benefit (as required by charity law). It seeks to assess the effectiveness of the method as a means of measuring performance of third sector organisations (TSOs). Design/methodology/approach - – The method presented was used for qualitative reviewing and scoring of 1,400 sets of charity reports and accounts from England and Wales on 22 variables, with most variables involving an assessment of narratives on a five-point quality score. Various methods of standardising the scoring between different reviewers and different types of charities are considered. Findings - – The method was found to be largely effective in discriminating between charities which had a clear focus on the public benefit requirement and those which did not. However, other factors, such as lack of awareness of the requirements and levels of concern regarding charitable status, appear to have had a substantial impact on reporting practice. Research limitations/implications - – The limitations and uncertainties in converting a qualitative assessment of a narrative into a numerical score are discussed. Practical implications - – The method is likely to be of value for other studies of narrative reporting in financial statements, especially in relation to fulfilment by TSOs of the purposes for which they were established. Originality/value - – The paper contributes both to the understanding of narrative reporting by TSOs and to the development of methodological approaches for such analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Gareth G. Morgan, 2013. "Purposes, activities and beneficiaries," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 10(3/4), pages 295-315, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:qrampp:v:10:y:2013:i:3/4:p:295-315
    DOI: 10.1108/QRAM-04-2013-0016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/QRAM-04-2013-0016/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/QRAM-04-2013-0016/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/QRAM-04-2013-0016?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mousami Prasad & Trupti Mishra & Arti D. Kalro, 2017. "Environmental disclosure by Indian companies: an empirical study," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 1999-2022, October.
    2. Mattoasi Mattoasi, 2015. "Current Practice Performance Measurement Model: A Case Study in Indonesia," Journal of Education and Vocational Research, AMH International, vol. 6(2), pages 34-41.
    3. Julien Kleszczowski, 2016. "La place des parties prenantes dans l’évaluation de l’impact social des organisations non lucratives: étude empirique au sein d’une organisation française," Post-Print hal-01901230, HAL.
    4. Maged Albaz & Mohamed Mostafa Ali Albaz, 2019. "Core Perspectives Of Performance Measurement In Npos: In Search Of Accountability And Legitimacy," Economic Archive, D. A. Tsenov Academy of Economics, Svishtov, Bulgaria, issue 3 Year 20, pages 3-16.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:qrampp:v:10:y:2013:i:3/4:p:295-315. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.