Author
Listed:
- Kai DeMott
- Nathalie Repenning
- Fanny Almersson
- Gianluca Chimenti
- Gianluca F. Delfino
- Nelson Duenas
- Cecilia Fredriksson
- Zhengqi Guo
- Thomas Holde Skinnerup
- Leonid Sokolovskyy
- Xiaoyu Xu
Abstract
Purpose - The purpose of this paper revolves around the informal coming together of various doctoral students in the area of qualitative accounting and management research and the attempt to learn from their respective experiences. Together, the authors share personal reflections and valuable insights in revealing their vulnerabilities, aspirations and how they make sense of the PhD journey and their becoming as academics. Design/methodology/approach - This paper builds on an open discussion and written reflections among the authors, who represent a diverse set of both doctoral students at various levels and recent graduates from different countries, schools and backgrounds. Findings - The discussion highlights the struggles the authors experience as doctoral students, how they learn to cope with them as well as how they are socialized throughout their PhD journey. This allows them to take a critical stance towards increased productivity demands in academia and to embrace doctoral students as a powerful collective, whose aspirations may inspire a change of academic reality for the better. Originality/value - While guidance on how to succeed as doctoral students is common, we seldom hear about doctoral students as particularly “fragile selves” (Knights and Clarke, 2014) who, as opposed to more established scholars, are more actively experiencing difficulties with finding their ways in academia. The authors are thus motivated to create a rare common voice of a group of doctoral students here by providing a more intimate account of the PhD journey.
Suggested Citation
Kai DeMott & Nathalie Repenning & Fanny Almersson & Gianluca Chimenti & Gianluca F. Delfino & Nelson Duenas & Cecilia Fredriksson & Zhengqi Guo & Thomas Holde Skinnerup & Leonid Sokolovskyy & Xiaoyu X, 2024.
"Navigating the PhD journey: a collective consideration of junior academics in qualitative accounting and management research,"
Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(5), pages 602-621, October.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:qrampp:qram-02-2023-0031
DOI: 10.1108/QRAM-02-2023-0031
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:qrampp:qram-02-2023-0031. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.