IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/pappps/pap-04-2024-0066.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Essential lessons from an unpromising source: what reformers can learn from the Philippines on corruption control

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Johnston

Abstract

Purpose - Corruption control in the Republic of the Philippines (RP) has hardly failed, but it is not (yet) a success story either. Dramatic “people power” episodes have occurred, but populism has also, at times, led to repression. Still, essential reform lessons are available. Design/methodology/approach - This is a conceptual reassessment of corruption control. Central concerns include the types of corruption experienced in the country, incentives that might sustain collective action, the need to measure both corruption and reform, and linking reform to citizens’ quality of life. Findings - Top-down, whole-country approaches to reform often treat corruption as if it were the same everywhere, thereby emphasizing “best practices”. However, that can be misleading: a best practice in one society might be irrelevant, impossible, or harmful in another. Contemporary reformers must carefully examine the historical, social, economic, and political contexts, as well as the consequences of corruption. Groups and activities seemingly unrelated to corruption control can prove essential. Reformers must fight corruption with people, not for them. Originality/value - The ultimate goal of reform must be justice: redressing imbalances of power while building social and political trust.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Johnston, 2024. "Essential lessons from an unpromising source: what reformers can learn from the Philippines on corruption control," Public Administration and Policy: An Asia-Pacific Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 27(3), pages 344-356, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:pappps:pap-04-2024-0066
    DOI: 10.1108/PAP-04-2024-0066
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/PAP-04-2024-0066/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/PAP-04-2024-0066/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/PAP-04-2024-0066?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:pappps:pap-04-2024-0066. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.