IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/nejepp/neje-03-2018-0005.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transnational entrepreneurship, social networks, and institutional distance

Author

Listed:
  • Kaveh Moghaddam
  • Elzotbek Rustambekov
  • Thomas Weber
  • Sara Azarpanah

Abstract

Purpose - Transnational entrepreneurship can be considered a new stream of research where migrant entrepreneurship and international business research fields intersect. The purpose of this paper is to offer a theoretical framework to address the following research question: How do transnational entrepreneurs (TEs) develop their competitive advantage to succeed in a global market? Design/methodology/approach - Based on the strategic entrepreneurship approach and dynamic capability perspective, this paper suggests a theoretical framework to extend the understanding on how TEs may develop their competitive advantage to succeed in a global market. Findings - The suggested theoretical framework exhibits how the social ties of TEs affects their firm performance through the mediating effect of a bundle of two organizational processes (opportunity sensing and opportunity seizing) and the moderating effect of institutional distance between countries of origin and residence. Practical implications - TEs should not solely focus on their ethnic social ties. That is why this paper suggests that ethnic ties in the country of origin and the country of residence (COR) may lead to higher firm performance only if systematically used alongside nonethnic ties in the COR. Furthermore, it is crucial for TEs to understand the importance of dynamic capabilities in developing and sustaining their competitive advantage. Originality/value - Based on the strategic entrepreneurship approach, this paper suggests a social tie-based model of the dynamic capability to address the theoretical void in the transnational entrepreneurship literature. The linkage between social tie and performance which has been in a black box is examined in terms of how strong and weak social ties may affect different underlying processes of TEs’ dynamic capabilities differently. In contrast to the common conceptualization of institutional distance as a negative moderator in international business literature, institutional distance is theorized as a positive moderator in the suggested theoretical model of transnational entrepreneurship.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaveh Moghaddam & Elzotbek Rustambekov & Thomas Weber & Sara Azarpanah, 2018. "Transnational entrepreneurship, social networks, and institutional distance," New England Journal of Entrepreneurship, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(1), pages 45-64, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:nejepp:neje-03-2018-0005
    DOI: 10.1108/NEJE-03-2018-0005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/NEJE-03-2018-0005/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/NEJE-03-2018-0005/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/NEJE-03-2018-0005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wood, Geoffrey & Cooke, Fang Lee, 2023. "Transient entrepreneurs?: Chinese migrant small commercial businesses in South Africa," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(6).
    2. Nick Williams & Emmanuella Plakoyiannaki & Besnik A. Krasniqi, 2023. "When Forced Migrants Go Home: The Journey of Returnee Entrepreneurs in the Post-conflict Economies of Bosnia & Herzegovina and Kosovo," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 47(2), pages 430-460, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:nejepp:neje-03-2018-0005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.