IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/mrrpps/v38y2015i6p627-639.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceived organizational support and its outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Ishfaq Ahmed
  • Muhammad Musarrat Nawaz
  • Ghulam Ali
  • Talat Islam

Abstract

Purpose - – Riggleet al.’s (2009) research of 20 years literature (1986-2006) is the latest available meta-analysis on perceived organizational support and outcomes. There are seven years since no work has been done to see the changes in the research and its emphasis, which is the main target of this research. This study aimed at five major outcomes: employee engagement, job satisfaction, organizational commitment, organizational citizenship behavior and turnover intentions. Design/methodology/approach - – Hundred and twelve studies were included in meta-analysis containing at least one of the outcomes. Riggleet al.included 167 studies in their investigation from 1986 to 2006. This study adds value to the work of Riggleet al.by looking at the studies conducted from January 2007 to April 2014. Findings - – Findings of the study revealed that perceived organizational support had a strong positive impact on employee engagement, job satisfaction and organizational commitment, while its impact on organizational citizenship behavior and turnover intentions is moderate. Originality/value - – This study adds value by offering meta-analysis of the perceived organizational support and its outcomes for latest available literature (i.e. 2007-2014).

Suggested Citation

  • Ishfaq Ahmed & Muhammad Musarrat Nawaz & Ghulam Ali & Talat Islam, 2015. "Perceived organizational support and its outcomes," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 38(6), pages 627-639, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:eme:mrrpps:v:38:y:2015:i:6:p:627-639
    DOI: 10.1108/MRR-09-2013-0220
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/MRR-09-2013-0220/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/MRR-09-2013-0220/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/MRR-09-2013-0220?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Khahan Na-Nan & Jamnean Joungtrakul & Auemporn Dhienhirun, 2018. "The Influence of Perceived Organizational Support and Work Adjustment on the Employee Performance of Expatriate Teachers in Thailand," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(3), pages 105-105, March.
    2. Uma Maheswari Gopinath & Nishad Nawaz & Vijayakumar Gajenderan & Hariswaran Balasubramaniyan, 2021. "Antecedents of Emotional Intelligence: Perceived Organizational Support Impact on Ambidextrous Behavior of Standalone Business School Faculty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-12, July.
    3. Iliyasu Shiyanbade Najeemdeen & Bello Taofik Abidemi & Farah Diana Rahmat & Bannah Daniel Bulus, 2018. "Perceived Organizational Culture and Perceived Organizational Support on Work Engagement," Academic Journal of Economic Studies, Faculty of Finance, Banking and Accountancy Bucharest,"Dimitrie Cantemir" Christian University Bucharest, vol. 4(3), pages 199-208, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:mrrpps:v:38:y:2015:i:6:p:627-639. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.