IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/mrrpps/v37y2014i9p791-814.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding workplace meetings

Author

Listed:
  • Joseph A. Allen
  • Tammy Beck
  • Cliff W. Scott
  • Steven G. Rogelberg

Abstract

Purpose - – The purpose of this study is to propose a taxonomy of meeting purpose. Meetings are a workplace activity that deserves increased attention from researchers and practitioners. Previous researchers attempted to develop typologies of meeting purpose with limited success. Through a comparison of classification methodologies, the authors consider a taxonomy as the appropriate classification scheme for meeting purpose. The authors then utilize the developed taxonomy to investigate the frequency with which a representative sample of working adults engaged in meetings of these varying purposes. Their proposed taxonomy provides relevant classifications for future research on meetings as well and serves as a useful tool for managers seeking to use and evaluate the effectiveness of meetings within their organizations. Design/methodology/approach - – This study employs an inductive methodology using discourse analysis of qualitative meeting descriptions to develop a taxonomy of meeting purpose. The authors discourse analysis utilizes open-ended survey responses from a sample of working adults (n= 491). Findings - – The authors categorical analysis of open-ended questions resulted in a 16-category taxonomy of meeting purpose. The two most prevalent meeting purpose categories in this sample were “to discuss ongoing projects” at 11.6 per cent and “to routinely discuss the state of the business” at 10.8 per cent. The two least common meeting purpose categories in this sample were “to brainstorm for ideas or solutions” at 3.3 per cent and “to discuss productivity and efficiencies” at 3.7 per cent. The taxonomy was analyzed across organizational type and employee job level to identify differences between those important organizational and employee characteristics. Research limitations/implications - – The data suggested that meetings were institutionalized in organizations, making them useful at identifying differences between organizations as well as differences in employees in terms of scope of responsibility. Researchers and managers should consider the purposes for which they call meetings and how that manifests their overarching organizational focus, structure and goals. Originality/value - – This is the first study to overtly attempt to categorize the various purposes for which meetings are held. Further, this study develops a taxonomy of meeting purposes that will prove useful for investigating the different types of meeting purposes in a broad range of organizational types and structures.

Suggested Citation

  • Joseph A. Allen & Tammy Beck & Cliff W. Scott & Steven G. Rogelberg, 2014. "Understanding workplace meetings," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 37(9), pages 791-814, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:mrrpps:v:37:y:2014:i:9:p:791-814
    DOI: 10.1108/MRR-03-2013-0067
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/MRR-03-2013-0067/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/MRR-03-2013-0067/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/MRR-03-2013-0067?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Allen, Joseph A. & Lehmann-Willenbrock, Nale & Sands, Stephanie J., 2016. "Meetings as a positive boost? How and when meeting satisfaction impacts employee empowerment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 4340-4347.
    2. Fareed Ul Hassan & Syed Abdul Waheed & Nadia Gilani, 2019. "Teachers Perspectives on Headteachers Mistreatment: Exploring the other Side of the Coin," Global Regional Review, Humanity Only, vol. 4(4), pages 350-359, December.
    3. Fernandes, Bruno & Chimenti, Paula & Nogueira, Roberto, 2020. "A taxonomy of initiatives at work in the sharing economy," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 81-86.
    4. Romney, Alexander C. & Smith, Isaac H. & Okhuysen, Gerardo A., 2019. "In the trenches: Making your work meetings a success," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 62(4), pages 459-471.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:mrrpps:v:37:y:2014:i:9:p:791-814. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.