IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/mrrpps/v36y2013i4p400-416.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An evaluation of corporate governance practices of Islamic banks versus Islamic bank windows of conventional banks

Author

Listed:
  • Khuram Shahzad Bukhari
  • Hayat M. Awan
  • Faareha Ahmed

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore the perceived importance of management about various corporate governance dimensions being practiced in the Pakistani Islamic banking context. Design/methodology/approach - AHP is applied to analyze the corporate governance indexes and its dimension of five Islamic banks and 12 conventional banks which are providing Islamic banking facilities (Islamic bank window) throughout Pakistan. These dimensions included board of directors (BOD), Shari'ah supervisory board (SSB), audit, investment account holders (IAH), and information disclosure & transparency. Findings - The study reveals that the most significant dimensions which affect the corporate governance in Islamic banks are BOD and SSB, while the significant factors for Islamic banking windows are almost all dimensions of corporate governance. The correlation, regression, and ANOVA tests are applied to check the contributions of various factors of corporate governance mechanisms. These results indicate that there is a significant difference between Islamic banks and Islamic banking windows regarding the BOD and SSB. On the other hand, no significant difference is seen for the rest of the factors. The dissatisfaction level of customers reduces with the increase in the audit and BOD governance and all other factors have no impact in the case of Islamic banking windows; whereas in Islamic banks, in addition to audit and the SSB, information disclosure also significantly reduces the dissatisfaction level of customers. The concern of customers decreases significantly with the increasing level of IAH in the case of Islamic banking windows whereas in the case of Islamic banks a significant impact is seen for BOD, information disclosure, audit and IAH, but improvement in the governance of these rather increases the concern of customers toward compliance of Shari'ah and SSB has no contribution towards the concern of customers. Originality/value - This study has practical significance for conventional and Islamic banking policy makers for understanding the requirements of their stakeholders and aligning them with the fundamentals of Shari'ah compliance according to the guidelines provided by the code of corporate governance so as to get better insight into the relationship between customers' motives behind using Islamic banking products.

Suggested Citation

  • Khuram Shahzad Bukhari & Hayat M. Awan & Faareha Ahmed, 2013. "An evaluation of corporate governance practices of Islamic banks versus Islamic bank windows of conventional banks," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 36(4), pages 400-416, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eme:mrrpps:v:36:y:2013:i:4:p:400-416
    DOI: 10.1108/01409171311315003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/01409171311315003/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/01409171311315003/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/01409171311315003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohammad Rokibul Kabir & Farid A. Sobhani & Normah Omar & Norazida Mohamad, 2019. "Corporate Governance and Risk Disclosures: A Comparative Analysis Between Bangladeshi and Malaysian Islamic Banks," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 11(5), pages 110-125, August.
    2. Gulati, Rachita, 2022. "Bank ownership and governance quality in India: Evolution and detection of convergence clubs," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    3. Alam, Nafis & Ramachandran, Jayalakshmy & Nahomy, Aisha Homy, 2020. "The impact of corporate governance and agency effect on earnings management – A test of the dual banking system," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    4. Rachita Gulati, 2022. "Does regulatory under‐compliance with governance standards lead to bank instability? An exploration using Indian data," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(1), pages 138-180, March.
    5. S. B. Adam* & A. M. H. Al-Aidaros & S. B. Ishak, 2018. "The Moderating Effect of Islamic Work Ethics on the Relationship Between Corporate Governance and Performance of Islamic Financial Institutions in Nigeria: A Proposed Framework," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 1041-1048:6.
    6. Mariem Nsaibi & Ilyes Abidi & Mohamed Tahar Rajhi, 2020. "Corporate Governance and Operational Risk: Empirical Evidence," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 10(4), pages 107-115.
    7. Hameed, Abdullah, 2014. "Exploring the determinants of Pakistani Islamic Bank: Empirical Survey," MPRA Paper 59789, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 07 Nov 2014.
    8. Daing Maruak Sadek & Khilmy Abd Rahim & Zakaria Abas, 2018. "Islamic Corporate Governance In Islamic Financial Institutions," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 8(4), pages 1-10, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:mrrpps:v:36:y:2013:i:4:p:400-416. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.