IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/mrrpps/v33y2010i7p701-714.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Aesthetics and spirituality in the Australian services sector

Author

Listed:
  • Theodora Issa
  • David Pick

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to report on the results of research focusing on the relationship between aesthetics and spirituality in the Australian services sector. Design/methodology/approach - The research employs an interpretive mixed‐method approach. The data were collected using an online survey developed from a range of existing research tools. The population of interest is employees in the Australian services sector. The results were analysed using quantitative and qualitative data analysis techniques. Findings - The results of the analysis suggest that people who work in the Australian services sector tend to consider themselves “spiritual”, but it is a spirituality that is not necessarily religious, it might more likely be derived from aesthetics. Research limitations/implications - The main limitation of this study is the small sample size, which limits the inferences that can be drawn. Despite this limitation, this study has important implications in that it illuminates and attempts to resolve some of the conceptual confusion and contradictions in the existing literature relating to aesthetics and spirituality. It is proposed that aesthetics be equated with an expressed spirituality that has no connection with religiosity and spirituality be equated with expressed religious beliefs. Originality/value - This paper presents an investigation of the relatively neglected area of spirituality and aesthetics in the context of the Australian business environment and stimulates the debate about spirituality and aesthetics in the workplace.

Suggested Citation

  • Theodora Issa & David Pick, 2010. "Aesthetics and spirituality in the Australian services sector," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 33(7), pages 701-714, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:mrrpps:v:33:y:2010:i:7:p:701-714
    DOI: 10.1108/01409171011055799
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/01409171011055799/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/01409171011055799/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/01409171011055799?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sandra Leonara Obregon & Luis Felipe Dias Lopes & Fabiola Kaczam & Claudimar Pereira Veiga & Wesley Vieira Silva, 2022. "Religiosity, Spirituality and Work: A Systematic Literature Review and Research Directions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(2), pages 573-595, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:mrrpps:v:33:y:2010:i:7:p:701-714. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.