IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/mrrpps/v33y2010i12p1128-1139.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficient markets hypothesis and daily variation in small Pacific‐basin stock markets

Author

Listed:
  • Jeffrey E. Jarrett

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to indicate the existence of certain time series characteristics in daily stock returns of four small Asian (Pacific basin) financial markets. It aims to study efficient capital markets (efficient markets hypothesis (EMH)) as results may infer that there are predictable properties of the time series of prices of traded securities on organized markets in Singapore, Malaysia, Korea and Indonesia. Design/methodology/approach - The paper analyses daily variations in financial market data obtained from the Sandra Ann Morsilli Pacific‐basin Capital Markets Research Center (PACAP). Findings - The weak form efficiency test example examines the wide range of trading rules available to common investors. Some theorists try to convince everyone that the weak form of EMH is acceptable due to the weight of academic opinion. The paper finds that for short‐term (daily) changes, the markets of four of the smaller Pacific‐basin stock markets have predictable properties, which leads to the conclusion that the weak‐form EMH does not hold for these markets. Research limitations/implications - The study is limited to those firms and exchanges studied and the time period covered. Originality/value - There have been all too few studies of these small financial markets up to now and there is no other study utilizing these data on the Pacific basin (Asia). The results are unique and original.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeffrey E. Jarrett, 2010. "Efficient markets hypothesis and daily variation in small Pacific‐basin stock markets," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 33(12), pages 1128-1139, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:mrrpps:v:33:y:2010:i:12:p:1128-1139
    DOI: 10.1108/01409171011092185
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/01409171011092185/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/01409171011092185/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/01409171011092185?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pick-Soon Ling & Ruzita Abdul-Rahim, 2017. "Market Efficiency Based on Unconventional Technical Trading Strategies in Malaysian Stock Market," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 7(3), pages 88-96.
    2. Mai Ahmed Abdelzaher, 2021. "Study the Efficiency Hypothesis in the Egyptian Stock Market," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 11(1), pages 18-25.
    3. Bley, Jorg, 2011. "Are GCC stock markets predictable?," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 217-237, September.
    4. MOBEEN Ur Rehman & WAQAS Bin Khidmat, 2013. "Technical Analysis Of Efficient Market Hypothesis In A Frontier Market," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 8(2), pages 60-67, August.
    5. Adedoyin Isola LAWAL & Ezekiel OSENI & Abiola John ASALEYE & Bukola LAWAL-ADEDOYIN & Rachael OJEKA-JOHN, 2021. "Is the Stock Market Efficient? Evidence from Nonlinear Unit Root Tests for Nigeria," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 11(5), pages 384-395, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:mrrpps:v:33:y:2010:i:12:p:1128-1139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.