IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/mrrpps/mrr-10-2022-0728.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does dispositional greed predispose employees to hide knowledge?

Author

Listed:
  • Ibeawuchi K. Enwereuzor

Abstract

Purpose - As knowledge hiding is prevalent and often leaves severe detrimental consequences in its wake, it is imperative to place strategies on the front burner to identify its potential antecedents forthwith if there is going to be any headway to curtail the incidence of this phenomenon in organizations. Therefore, this study aims to examine the relationship between dispositional greed and knowledge hiding with the perceived loss of knowledge power as an underlying mechanism. Design/methodology/approach - A multi-wave, three weeks apart strategy was used for data collection. A sample of 262 employees working full-time in various organizations operating across different industries in Nigeria participated in this study. Data were analyzed with partial least squares structural equation modeling. Findings - The results showed that dispositional greed related positively to a perceived loss of knowledge power but insignificantly to any of the three dimensions of knowledge hiding (i.e. playing dumb, evasive hiding and rationalized hiding). On the other hand, the relationship between perceived loss of knowledge power and the three dimensions of knowledge hiding was positive. Finally, dispositional greed had an indirect positive relationship with the three dimensions of knowledge hiding through perceived loss of knowledge power. Research limitations/implications - All the variables were self-reported, which may lead to the same source bias. Practical implications - Human resources managers can subject employees to cognitive restructuring training to help them identify thinking patterns that contribute to the perception of losing their power in the organization if they share knowledge and help reshape their perceptions regarding knowledge sharing. Management can use rewards to encourage employees to adopt knowledge sharing and refrain from knowledge hiding as a desired organizational norm. Originality/value - This study offers novel insights that identify an underlying mechanism that encourages greedy employees to enact knowledge hiding.

Suggested Citation

  • Ibeawuchi K. Enwereuzor, 2023. "Does dispositional greed predispose employees to hide knowledge?," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 46(11), pages 1542-1558, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eme:mrrpps:mrr-10-2022-0728
    DOI: 10.1108/MRR-10-2022-0728
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/MRR-10-2022-0728/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/MRR-10-2022-0728/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/MRR-10-2022-0728?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vinoi, Nivin & Shankar, Amit & Khalil, Ashraf & Mehrotra, Ankit & Kumar, Jitender, 2024. "Holding on to your memories: Factors influencing social media hoarding behaviour," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    2. Vinoi, Nivin & Shankar, Amit & Mehrotra, Ankit & Kumar, Jitender & Azad, Nasreen, 2024. "Enablers and inhibitors of digital hoarding behaviour. An application of dual-factor theory and regret theory," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:mrrpps:mrr-10-2022-0728. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.