IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/majpps/02686900510606119.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A fuzzy‐based algorithm for auditors to detect elements of fraud in settled insurance claims

Author

Listed:
  • Jagdish Pathak
  • Navneet Vidyarthi
  • Scott L. Summers

Abstract

Purpose - In the current global economy, the survival of an insurance company depends on its ability to respond to the customer demands. One of the demands of customers is efficient settlement of insurance claims. All insurance companies face the conflicting goals of authenticating claims and settling claims quickly. The use of human adjusters in claim settlement process leaves room for subjective judgment and the use of discretion while finalizing a claim. It has been observed that the opportunity exists for claim adjustors to settle insurance claims in favor of the claimants simply by colluding with the claimant and sacrificing the monetary interest of the insurers. The increasing cost of human experts for authentication (fraud detection) has led many companies to develop technological solutions such as expert systems to assist in the authentication of processed claims. Design/methodology/approach - We have used fuzzy math in combination with the expert systems technology to design this model system. Findings - We develop a fuzzy logic based expert system that can identify and evaluate whether elements of fraud are involved in insurance claims settlement. Research limitations/implications - We could not obtain real life data from any one of the insurance companies even after various attempts in Canada. Canadian Privacy Legislation does not permit these organizations to share them with any one. Practical implications - This expert system can help decide if settled claims are genuine or if an element of fraud might exist which needs substantive testing by an auditor. The proposed methodology has been illustrated with an example that tends to model insurance claims in general. Originality/value - The model designed in this paper is original and carries a substantial value to internal/external auditing professional who has access to these data to train the inference engine.

Suggested Citation

  • Jagdish Pathak & Navneet Vidyarthi & Scott L. Summers, 2005. "A fuzzy‐based algorithm for auditors to detect elements of fraud in settled insurance claims," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 20(6), pages 632-644, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:majpps:02686900510606119
    DOI: 10.1108/02686900510606119
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/02686900510606119/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/02686900510606119/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/02686900510606119?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Auditing; Fuzzy logic; Fraud;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:majpps:02686900510606119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.