IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/jrfpps/jrf-09-2019-0183.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enterprise risk management and Solvency II: the system of governance and the Own Risk and Solvency Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Pablo Durán Santomil
  • Luis Otero González

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to analyze how enterprise risk management (ERM), the system of governance and the Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) have been boosted with the entry of Solvency II. Design/methodology/approach - For this analysis, the authors have undertaken a survey of chief risk officers (CROs) working in Spanish insurance companies. Findings - The results show that Solvency II has definitely promoted ERM in the European insurance industry and improved the system of governance of the insurance companies, and that the perceived value of the ORSA for the companies is higher than the cost. It is clear that the quality of ERM implemented by companies is higher in those that face more complex risks and with greater interdependencies – that is, larger companies, foreign insurers and insurers with several lines of business – but is unaffected by the legal form of the entity (mutual/corporation). Originality/value - This study conducts primary research with surveys of CROs and develops a measure of the quality of ERM implemented by insurance companies.

Suggested Citation

  • Pablo Durán Santomil & Luis Otero González, 2020. "Enterprise risk management and Solvency II: the system of governance and the Own Risk and Solvency Assessment," Journal of Risk Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(4), pages 317-332, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:jrfpps:jrf-09-2019-0183
    DOI: 10.1108/JRF-09-2019-0183
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JRF-09-2019-0183/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JRF-09-2019-0183/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/JRF-09-2019-0183?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guo, Heng, 2023. "Enterprise litigation risk and risk taking," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PA).
    2. Alberto Bettanti & Antonella Lanati, 2021. "How chief risk officers (CROs) can have meaningful and productive dealings with insurance agencies: a leading example," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(5), pages 1-25, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jrfpps:jrf-09-2019-0183. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.