Author
Abstract
Purpose - The cyber insurance market in Germany shows a notable gap: while many large corporations are already demanding cyber insurance, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are still reluctant, despite its benefits. This study aims to analyze the behavioral and informational factors that influence cyber insurance decision-making and uncover the determinants that may inhibit demand among German SMEs. Design/methodology/approach - Using the data from a questionnaire survey of 1,248 German SME executives, the influence of behavioral and informational factors on cyber insurance demand is assessed utilizing logistic regression. Findings - The results reveal that the estimated financial impact and anxiety about a potential cyberattack significantly increase the likelihood of SMEs purchasing cyber insurance. Conversely, the perceived probability of future cyberattacks and prior experience do not significantly influence insurance decisions, probably due to challenges in probability estimation. In addition, confidence in the organization’s cyber risk management has a positive but insignificant influence on cyber insurance demand. External cybersecurity specialists positively impact cyber insurance demand, while internal cyber risk assessment has no significant influence, highlighting the challenges SMEs face in cyber risk assessment. Independent Internet research negatively impacts the purchase of cyber insurance, probably due to information overload. Originality/value - This study significantly contributes to the literature on corporate (cyber) insurance purchasing by primarily focusing on behavioral influences on SMEs’ insurance decision-making. It is also the first empirical analysis of the key information sources used by SMEs in their insurance decision-making, thereby providing various academic and practical implications.
Suggested Citation
Alina Salzberger, 2025.
"An empirical analysis of the behavioral influences and information sources affecting the cyber insurance decisions of German SMEs,"
Journal of Risk Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 26(2), pages 213-240, January.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:jrfpps:jrf-05-2024-0151
DOI: 10.1108/JRF-05-2024-0151
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jrfpps:jrf-05-2024-0151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.