IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/jrfpps/15265941311301161.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The relationship between moral hazard and insurance fraud

Author

Listed:
  • Mahito Okura

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to investigate the insurance market in which moral hazard and insurance fraud coexist. In this situation, this research examines the relationship between moral hazard and insurance fraud. Also, this research shows how the amount of policyholder's effort to lower accident probability changes when insurance firm increases their investment in preventing insurance fraud. Design/methodology/approach - Using a theoretical model containing five‐stages, the author sheds light on how the possibility of insurance fraud affects the amount of policyholder's effort. Findings - The main results of this research are as follows. First, the amount of policyholder's effort is a weakly monotone decreasing function of the insurance firm's investment in preventing insurance fraud. Second, unlike in previous moral hazard models, the policyholder chooses a strictly positive amount of effort even in the full insurance case because the possibility of insurance fraud gives an incentive to realize policyholder's effort. Third, the amount of insurance firm's investment in preventing insurance fraud depends on whether it wants to give an additional incentive to policyholder's effort in exchange for realizing the possibility of insurance fraud. Originality/value - This is the first paper to investigate the relationship between moral hazard and insurance fraud by using the microeconomic theory.

Suggested Citation

  • Mahito Okura, 2013. "The relationship between moral hazard and insurance fraud," Journal of Risk Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 14(2), pages 120-128, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:jrfpps:15265941311301161
    DOI: 10.1108/15265941311301161
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/15265941311301161/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/15265941311301161/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/15265941311301161?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Okura Mahito & Sakaki Motohiro & Yoshizawa Takuya, 2022. "A Game-Theoretic Analysis of the Sanctions for Breach of Duty to Disclose in Insurance Contracts: A Comparison of the “All or Nothing” and “Pro Rata” Methods," Asian Journal of Law and Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 13(3), pages 255-276, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jrfpps:15265941311301161. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.