IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/jpifpp/v34y2016i6p664-669.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The internal rate of return (IRR): projections, benchmarks and pitfalls

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Patrick
  • Nick French

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to discuss the use of the internal rate of return (IRR) as a principal measure of performance of investments and to highlight some of the weaknesses of the IRR in evaluating investments in this way. Design/methodology/approach - This Education Briefing is an overview of the limitations of the IRR in making capital budgeting decisions. It is illustrated with a number of counter-intuitive examples. Findings - The advantage of the IRR is that it is, on the surface, a wonderfully simple benchmark. One figure that tells a story. But, the disadvantage is that if used in isolation the IRR can give misleading results when used to assess investment proposals. Practical implications - The IRR should be used in conjunction with other analyses to appraise projects, so that the user can determine its veracity in the context of other benchmarks. This context is particularly important when assessing investments with unusual cash flows. Originality/value - This is a review of existing models.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Patrick & Nick French, 2016. "The internal rate of return (IRR): projections, benchmarks and pitfalls," Journal of Property Investment & Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 34(6), pages 664-669, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:eme:jpifpp:v:34:y:2016:i:6:p:664-669
    DOI: 10.1108/JPIF-07-2016-0059
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JPIF-07-2016-0059/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JPIF-07-2016-0059/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/JPIF-07-2016-0059?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. James Chege Wangui & Paul R. Kenyon & Peter R. Tozer & James P. Millner & Sarah J. Pain, 2021. "Bioeconomic Modelling to Assess the Impacts of Using Native Shrubs on the Marginal Portions of the Sheep and Beef Hill Country Farms in New Zealand," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Souza, Sulma Vanessa & Gimenes, Régio Marcio Toesca & Binotto, Erlaine, 2019. "Economic viability for deploying hydroponic system in emerging countries: A differentiated risk adjustment proposal," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 357-369.
    3. Waldemar Swiderski & Wieslawa Rolek, 2021. "A Model of Product Life Cycle Cost Management Based on the Example of the Spartan Multimedia Shooting Training System," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-9, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jpifpp:v:34:y:2016:i:6:p:664-669. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.