IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/jpifpp/v31y2013i4p345-359.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is the valuer the barrier to identifying the value of sustainability?

Author

Listed:
  • Georgia Warren‐Myers

Abstract

Purpose - Broad‐scale investment in sustainability is limited due to the lack of evidence of the relationship between sustainability and the property's market value. Although evidence is amassing and being analyzed through advanced modeling, this evidence is not being reflected in the valuation process. Valuers have a pivotal role in financial markets, in the reporting of asset values. Consequently, they are the current barrier in large‐scale investment in sustainability, due to their lack of reporting or consideration of sustainability in the valuation process. This paper seeks to address these issues. Design/methodology/approach - This research investigates, in the Australian context, whether valuers are incorporating sustainability as a consideration in the valuation process and their depth of reporting on it. Further, the research investigates whether valuers have the knowledge and skills to accurately report on sustainability in the valuation process. This research used an online survey to gather responses from valuers around Australia, using a combination of structured and semi‐structured questions. Findings - This paper has identified that valuers are identifying a value relationship between sustainability and market value, and clearly emphasizing that they are not the barrier to this relationship from a lack of inclusion in valuation practice. However, what this research has identified is that, although valuers are acknowledging sustainability in their practice, they may be inhibiting further investment in sustainability due to inaccurate or misjudged assessments of sustainability in valuations. Practical implications - The research highlights the implications for the broader market and the valuation profession, as a result of the valuers' current lack of knowledge, skills and ability to incorporate or consider sustainability in the valuation process. The potential for inaccurate knowledge regarding sustainability being incorporated in the valuation process is very high, and could potentially have litigious issues in the future. Originality/value - The research has highlighted that, although valuers are beginning to consider sustainability at some level in the valuation process, their current knowledge of sustainability and its implications for long‐term viability is limited and in some cases grossly inaccurate. Consequently, this research has identified there is an imperative requirement for investigation into appropriate, accurate knowledge development in the field of sustainability for the valuation profession.

Suggested Citation

  • Georgia Warren‐Myers, 2013. "Is the valuer the barrier to identifying the value of sustainability?," Journal of Property Investment & Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 31(4), pages 345-359, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:jpifpp:v:31:y:2013:i:4:p:345-359
    DOI: 10.1108/JPIF-01-2013-0004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JPIF-01-2013-0004/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JPIF-01-2013-0004/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/JPIF-01-2013-0004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eerika Janhunen & Niina Leskinen & Seppo Junnila, 2020. "The Economic Viability of a Progressive Smart Building System with Power Storage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Lizawati Abdullah & Wan Nur Ayuni Wan Ab Rasid & Thuraiya Mohd, 2018. "The Role of Valuer in Sustainable Valuation: A Review," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 8(2), pages 740-749, February.
    3. Niina Leskinen & Jussi Vimpari & Seppo Junnila, 2020. "A Review of the Impact of Green Building Certification on the Cash Flows and Values of Commercial Properties," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-22, March.
    4. Babatunji Samuel Adedeji & Tze Sen Ong & Mohammad Mizanur Rahman & Olusoji Olumide Odukoya & Md. Kausar Alam, 2019. "Corporate Governance, Sustainability Initiatives and Firm Performance: Theoretical and Conceptual Perspectives," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 9(1), pages 35-47, January.
    5. Reza Kiani Mavi & Denise Gengatharen & Neda Kiani Mavi & Richard Hughes & Alistair Campbell & Ross Yates, 2021. "Sustainability in Construction Projects: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jpifpp:v:31:y:2013:i:4:p:345-359. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.