Author
Listed:
- Deborah Levy
- Gemma Peterson
Abstract
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore how the availability of sustainable buildings may affect the decisions made by office occupiers in their building selection process. Design/methodology/approach - The structure of the paper includes a review of both the sustainability literature and traditional location literature which serves to inform the study. A qualitative study comprising 13 in‐depth one‐to‐one interviews with decision makers of a variety of organisations who have chosen to locate in a “sustainable” building within the central business district in Auckland, New Zealand is undertaken. Findings - The research suggests that selecting a building that is perceived to be sustainable by the market may not be the ultimate driving factor in the office location decision and that more emphasis is placed on micro location factors, attractiveness to staff, marketing and flexibility. The importance of each of these factors tends to be influenced by the size and type of organisation as well as the availability of suitable buildings in the market. The research reinforces the finding that organisations generally seek accommodation that can “add value” to their specific business. Practical implications - The study provides a deeper understanding on the impact of the emergence of sustainable buildings in the decision‐making process of office tenants and how this may be affected by the size and type of the occupier organisation. These findings will be of practical application to property professionals involved in the development, sale and valuing of sustainable buildings. Originality/value - This paper provides in‐depth insights into business location decisions from the perspective of a variety of tenants choosing to locate within a CBD.
Suggested Citation
Deborah Levy & Gemma Peterson, 2013.
"The effect of sustainability on commercial occupiers' building choice,"
Journal of Property Investment & Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 31(3), pages 267-284, April.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:jpifpp:v:31:y:2013:i:3:p:267-284
DOI: 10.1108/14635781311322238
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jpifpp:v:31:y:2013:i:3:p:267-284. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.