Author
Listed:
- Liza Khmara
- Michael Touchton
Abstract
Purpose - Protected areas, lands and seas set aside for nature conservation, are the main tool for governments to conserve biodiversity. The complexity of government processes, however, can lead to fragmentation in protected area systems. Institutional fragmentation can preclude central coordination and undermine funding and performance. Here, we examine the impact of institutional fragmentation on budgets for protected area agencies in the United States, an important actor in the global conservation movement. Design/methodology/approach - This article uses visual text and network analysis with agency budget documents to examine linkages between agencies. These findings are triangulated with semi-structured interviews analyzed with axial coding to develop a framework for the budget process and its outcomes in US protected area agencies. Findings - The visual text analysis demonstrates varying levels of coordination between agencies. The conceptual framework shows that five factors - mismatches within agencies, the influence of the Presidential administration, the power of Congress as the appropriator of funds, external forces that influence Congress, and a lack of accountability in allocations – lead to institutional fragmentation and “disparate nature enclaves”. Research limitations/implications - Interview findings are derived from a non-representative population, and thus should not be generalized for all agencies or budget systems. Practical implications - Understanding the factors influencing agency budget proposals will inform policy to make budgeting more effective for U.S. and other national protected area systems. Originality/value - Few studies have conducted qualitative analyses of federal agencies and their budgets, particularly for federal protected areas.
Suggested Citation
Liza Khmara & Michael Touchton, 2024.
"Institutional fragmentation in United States protected area agencies and its impact on budget processes,"
Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 36(4), pages 490-513, July.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:jpbafm:jpbafm-08-2023-0147
DOI: 10.1108/JPBAFM-08-2023-0147
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jpbafm:jpbafm-08-2023-0147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.