IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/jopppp/jopp-12-2023-0091.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trends and hotspots in public food procurement: exploring planetary boundaries and human needs in an integrative literature review

Author

Listed:
  • Erica Kushihara Akim
  • Diogo Aparecido Lopes Silva
  • Luiz Carlos de Faria

Abstract

Purpose - Using an Integrative Literature Review (ILR), this study aims to investigate the components defining the Safe and Just Operating Space (SJOS) within food systems and assess their applicability in decision-making for public food procurement (PFP). Design/methodology/approach - Data concerning SJOS implementation in food systems and the criteria used in PFP were retrieved from the Web of Science and Scopus databases, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol. Findings - The analysis of the literature highlights that climate change (n= 31; 17%) and water use (n= 29; 16%) are the primary focus areas regarding Planetary Boundaries (PB), followed the nitrogen cycle, land use, biodiversity loss and the phosphorus cycle. In PFP, key criteria linked to PB encompass climate change (n= 19; 7.2%), water use (n= 17; 6.44%) and chemical pollution (n= 17; 6.44%). The social and ethical dimensions underscore labour (n= 18; 6.82%), water (n= 17; 6.44%), income (n= 16; 6.06%) and energy (n= 16; 6.06%). Research limitations/implications - Despite the strengths of this study, certain limitations should be acknowledged. Although the inclusion and exclusion criteria for the reviewed articles were clearly defined, it is possible that relevant literature was unintentionally excluded. Expanding the scope to include grey literature – such as government documents, reports, policy statements and statistical reports – could provide additional insights and broaden the scope of the findings. Moreover, the search was limited to the Web of Science and Scopus databases, which may have resulted in the omission of relevant studies, particularly those published in non-English languages or not indexed journals. Practical implications - The identified procurement criteria can help public administrators develop guidelines and tools for food procurement that consider the SJOS. Social implications - This paper offers an understanding of the connection between planetary processes and human well-being in the context of PFP. Originality/value - This pioneering research lays the groundwork for future agendas in this field and encourages reflection on critical factors essential for selecting methods and standards applied in practical public procurement.

Suggested Citation

  • Erica Kushihara Akim & Diogo Aparecido Lopes Silva & Luiz Carlos de Faria, 2025. "Trends and hotspots in public food procurement: exploring planetary boundaries and human needs in an integrative literature review," Journal of Public Procurement, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 25(1), pages 95-119, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:jopppp:jopp-12-2023-0091
    DOI: 10.1108/JOPP-12-2023-0091
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JOPP-12-2023-0091/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JOPP-12-2023-0091/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/JOPP-12-2023-0091?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jopppp:jopp-12-2023-0091. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.