Author
Listed:
- Eric Halford
- Ian Gibson
- Mark Newfield
- Mufazzal Dhanwala
Abstract
Purpose - The purpose of this study is twofold. Firstly, this study outlines the creation of an ML “bolt on” transaction monitoring risk scoring model. This ML model uses predictive classification to score the likelihood of an alert being a false or true positive based on historical data. Secondly, this study explores the results of implementing the model in a real-world environment. This is valuable, as it explores the potential to reduce the workload on human analysts responsible for reviewing alerts, by “hibernating” low-risk alerts and “auto-escalating” high-risk alerts. Design/methodology/approach - Machine learning is used to create a “bolt on” model that sits on top of existing rule-based transaction monitoring systems to improve their effectiveness and efficiency. This was achieved by developing a model to mimic the analysts alert review process with the aim of improving efficiency, reducing investigation timeliness and ultimately reducing time-to-SAR duration. The model did so by scoring anti-money laundering (AML) alerts to help conduct three actions: automatic hibernation of low-risk alerts; review of medium-risk alerts by the level 1 team; and auto-escalation of high-risk alerts to the level 2 team for detailed investigation. Findings - The model was successful in consistently identifying low-risk alerts correctly, significantly reducing the volume of false positives that needed manual review. Prior to implementation, 100% of alerts had to be reviewed, by the end of the examined period, 19% of alerts were hibernated and 18% of alerts were auto-escalated. Time taken to investigate and submit SARs was reduced by 61%. Practical implications - The practical implications of the study lie in its contributions to helping banking institutions effectively keep pace with the increasing volume of transactions, in a cost effective and efficient manner, which has a positive effect on their reputation through enhancing their AML response. Social implications - The model outlined greatly enhances the timeliness of investigations, which is crucial for money laundering prevention and enables timely responses by institutions and law enforcement agencies to make better use of the investigation timeframe after an offence is identified, enabling them to more rapidly address threats, freeze assets when necessary, and secure vital evidence before it is lost. Originality/value - This study provides a blueprint for other financial institutions to consider similar approaches to AML. This is significant because previous studies of machine learning applications in the domain of AML have not explored this type of use before, particularly in the context of machine learning ensembled techniques. It also addressed several cited limitations of previous research by increasing the depth of information in the datasets used and providing a formal evaluation. Importantly, the blueprint and evaluation metrics used in this study ensure its reproducibility, addressing another previously identified academic issue.
Suggested Citation
Eric Halford & Ian Gibson & Mark Newfield & Mufazzal Dhanwala, 2025.
"Developing a scoring model for managing money laundering transactions using machine learning,"
Journal of Money Laundering Control, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 28(7), pages 30-49, March.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:jmlcpp:jmlc-09-2024-0152
DOI: 10.1108/JMLC-09-2024-0152
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jmlcpp:jmlc-09-2024-0152. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.