Author
Listed:
- Nurulhuda Abd Rahman
- Nor’azam Mastuki
- Muhamad Rahimi Osman
- Nawal Kasim
Abstract
Purpose - The purpose of this paper looks into how the Islamic legal maxims (ILM) could provide a basis forSharīʿahaudit practices in assisting the institution’s managerial practice to achieve Maqasid al Shari’ah (MS). Design/methodology/approach - The findings of the study recorded in this paper are based on a single case study selected from a preliminary study. The qualitative approach was used, where two phases of a semi-structured interview were conducted on the targeted participants in their natural settings. Findings - It was found that with the implementation ofSharīʿahaudit practices, ILM supports the achievement of MS by Islamic banks. With this, the income generated by these banking institutions is halal, and all business transactions and operations will not violate theSharīʿahprinciples. Furthermore, the ILM includes principles such as “certainty is not overruled by doubt,” “matters determined according to intentions,” “the norm in transactions is that of permissibility,” “harm must be eliminated” and “judgment is to be based on knowledge and understanding.” Social implications - The findings of this study have provided valuable information that would lead Muslim auditors to exhibit a strong character while abiding by Islamic principles. Originality/value - MS is strongly recommended in Islamic banking institutions because of the significant relationship between MS and the objectives of business transactions where wealth must be protected in the prevention of incoming hardships occurring in society. Moreover, this paper focuses on the application of ILM in theSharīʿahaudit practices as a part of theSharīʿahgovernance in Islamic banks.
Suggested Citation
Nurulhuda Abd Rahman & Nor’azam Mastuki & Muhamad Rahimi Osman & Nawal Kasim, 2020.
"Islamic legal maxim forShari’ahaudit in Islamic bank,"
Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(2), pages 457-471, January.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:jiabrp:jiabr-11-2017-0170
DOI: 10.1108/JIABR-11-2017-0170
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jiabrp:jiabr-11-2017-0170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.