IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/jiabrp/jiabr-10-2020-0336.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Financial risks and performance of conventional and Islamic banks: do reputational risk matters?

Author

Listed:
  • Mahnoor Anjum Butt
  • Huma Ayub
  • Bilal Latif
  • Fawad Asif
  • Malik Shahzad Shabbir
  • Ammar Aftab Raja

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to shed light on the reputational risk, which is elusive and difficult to measure due to the lack of its conclusive definition. Literature supports the notion that financial risks may translate into reputational risks that pose threat to bank performance. However, empirical investigations in this context are still at their nascent stage. Design/methodology/approach - This study has used a panel dataset for the sample of 24 conventional and Islamic banks regarding the period 2007–2017 by using a structural equation model. Findings - The results of this study show that reputational risk partially mediates the relationship between financial risks and the performance of conventional banks. However, for Islamic banks, the reputational risk remains insignificant as a mediator. This study provides significant implications to risk managers in banks, regulators and academics to understand the role of reputational risk linked to financial risks for the improvement of bank performance. Originality/value - This study aims to add to the literature by measuring reputational risk through the shareholders reputational score index, which is used as a mediator to determine whether financial risks of banks affect the performance of conventional and Islamic banks in Pakistan.

Suggested Citation

  • Mahnoor Anjum Butt & Huma Ayub & Bilal Latif & Fawad Asif & Malik Shahzad Shabbir & Ammar Aftab Raja, 2022. "Financial risks and performance of conventional and Islamic banks: do reputational risk matters?," Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(4), pages 581-595, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eme:jiabrp:jiabr-10-2020-0336
    DOI: 10.1108/JIABR-10-2020-0336
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JIABR-10-2020-0336/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JIABR-10-2020-0336/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/JIABR-10-2020-0336?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Haishi Li & Youxue Jiang & Anam Ashiq & Asma Salman & Mohammad Haseeb & Malik Shahzad Shabbir, 2023. "The role of technological innovation, strategy, firms performance, and firms size and their aggregate impact on organizational structure," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(4), pages 2010-2020, June.
    2. Wanli Fang & Yijie Bian, 2024. "Do Affordable, Clean, and Modern Energy Matter for Environmental Sustainability? The Dynamic Effects of Different Strategies of Renewable Energy, Carbon Emissions, and Trade Openness on Sustainable Ec," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 9440-9451, June.
    3. Huma Sikandar & Umar Haiyat Abdul Kohar & Erika Eleana Corzo-Palomo & Valery Kimiyo Gamero-Huarcaya & Carlos Samuel Ramos-Meza & Malik Shahzad Shabbir & Vipin Jain, 2024. "Mapping the Development of Open Innovation Research in Business and Management Field: A Bibliometric Analysis," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 9868-9890, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jiabrp:jiabr-10-2020-0336. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.