IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/jiabrp/jiabr-05-2017-0064.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Privileging downward accountability inWaqfmanagement

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmad Zamri Osman
  • Gloria Agyemang

Abstract

Purpose - This paper aims to argue for the need of beneficiaries’ involvement in matters impacting them. The current effort to improvewaqfmanagement and the trend ofwaqfstudies seems to focus onwaqffinancing/investment using sophisticated financial tools and inviting participation from business entities. There was no conscious effort to engage the beneficiaries/public as the means to inform and improve the waywaqfproperties are managed despite it being, arguably, the primary stakeholder. Design/methodology/approach - This is a qualitative study informed by the concept of downward accountability. Interviews with staff involved in managingwaqfproperties are conducted. Data is interpreted, resulting in emerging themes. Findings - This paper argues that the waywaqfentity is structured and the staff’s value is important in determining whether benefit accrues to beneficiaries. Grounded on Islamic ethos, the values of individual staff is imperative in ensuring downward accountability is discharged. The closeness and empathy between staff and beneficiaries contribute towards a meaningful operationalisation of downward accountability. Research limitations/implications - Because of the nature of methodology focusing on specificwaqfpractices in two specificwaqfsettings, the result must be interpreted within its context. Practical implications - Waqfentity needs to have a structure where beneficiaries are meaningfully involved. Social implications - This paper argues that the benefit ofwaqfestablishment may not accrue to beneficiaries if it is undertaken without their engagement. Originality/value - This paper raises the importance of engaging beneficiaries as one of the approaches in serving them. Any future project involving the targeted beneficiaries should involve them in some capacities.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmad Zamri Osman & Gloria Agyemang, 2020. "Privileging downward accountability inWaqfmanagement," Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(3), pages 533-554, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:jiabrp:jiabr-05-2017-0064
    DOI: 10.1108/JIABR-05-2017-0064
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JIABR-05-2017-0064/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JIABR-05-2017-0064/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/JIABR-05-2017-0064?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Scobie, Matthew & Lee, Bill & Smyth, Stewart, 2023. "Grounded accountability and Indigenous self-determination," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    2. Agyemang, Gloria, 2024. "Let's have a relook at accountability," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(1).
    3. Kingston, Kylie L. & Furneaux, Craig & de Zwaan, Laura & Alderman, Lyn, 2023. "Avoiding the accountability ‘sham-ritual’: An agonistic approach to beneficiaries’ participation in evaluation within nonprofit organisations," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    4. Alshurafa, Mohammed & Kamla, Rania, 2024. "Accountability and the postcolonial identity of Palestinian human rights NGO activists," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jiabrp:jiabr-05-2017-0064. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.