Author
Listed:
- Abdelhamid K. Abdelmaaboud
- Ana Isabel Polo Peña
- Abeer A. Mahrous
Abstract
Purpose - This study introduces three variables related to brands that have the potential to enhance university students' advocacy intentions. The research explores how university brand identification, the perceived prestige of the university brand and the social benefits associated with the university brand impact students' advocacy intentions. Additionally, the study examines the moderating role of gender in these relationships. Design/methodology/approach - Cross-sectional surveys of 326 undergraduate students enrolled in a Spanish university, and structural equation modeling was used to test and validate the conceptual model. Findings - The findings from the structural equation modeling indicate that university brand identification, perceived university brand prestige and university brand social benefits significantly influence students' advocacy intentions. Furthermore, the multigroup analysis reveals a gender difference in the factors influencing advocacy intentions. Female students demonstrate significance in all three antecedents, whereas male students only show significance in university brand identification and perceived university brand prestige. Practical implications - The current study's findings provide several insights for higher education institutions in developing enduring and committed relationships with their students. Originality/value - This study offers relevant insights into the body of research on university branding, explaining the students' advocacy intentions through the variables of university brand identification, perceived university brand prestige and university brand social benefits. Also, this study is a novelty in introducing empirical evidence for the importance of the moderating role of students' gender.
Suggested Citation
Abdelhamid K. Abdelmaaboud & Ana Isabel Polo Peña & Abeer A. Mahrous, 2024.
"Unveiling the path to university students' advocacy intention: exploring the intriguing gender moderation,"
Journal of Humanities and Applied Social Sciences, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 7(1), pages 38-57, January.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:jhassp:jhass-07-2023-0078
DOI: 10.1108/JHASS-07-2023-0078
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jhassp:jhass-07-2023-0078. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.