IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/jfrcpp/v16y2008i2p192-199.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Financial services and markets tribunal rules on application of financial promotion regime

Author

Listed:
  • Joanna Gray

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to describe the Financial Services and Markets Tribunal ruling on the application of the financial promotion regime, involving Fox Hayes v. Financial Services Authority. Design/methodology/approach - The paper outlines the facts surrounding the case and comments on the ruling. Findings - The Tribunal disagreed with the FSA that the applicant had acted negligently or recklessly. Originality/value - The paper highlights the lack of clarity and guidance on the part of the FSA as to exactly which firms on its list of unauthorised firms it considered as “boiler rooms” and which it did not.

Suggested Citation

  • Joanna Gray, 2008. "Financial services and markets tribunal rules on application of financial promotion regime," Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 16(2), pages 192-199, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:eme:jfrcpp:v:16:y:2008:i:2:p:192-199
    DOI: 10.1108/13581980810869832
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/13581980810869832/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/13581980810869832/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/13581980810869832?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Legal decisions; Tribunals;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jfrcpp:v:16:y:2008:i:2:p:192-199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.