IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/jfrcpp/jfrc-07-2018-0103.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effectiveness of MiFID provisions for professional clients: a critical review

Author

Listed:
  • Tom Loonen
  • Randy Pattiselanno

Abstract

Purpose - This paper aims to identify the duty of care that applies to ‘professionally classified clients’ based on the recently implemented Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) as well as the previous Markets in Financial Instruments Directive I (MiFID I). The authors place critical notes on the effectiveness of some MiFID provisions. Design/methodology/approach - The authors have reviewed the Delegated Acts of MiFID I and II, as well as Q&A’s of the European Regulator, ESMA and jurisprudence. The authors aim to add value by facilitating a discussion on the effectiveness of applicable MiFID provisions. Findings - This review of the legal provisions provides researchers and practitioners in the investment sectors with a clear overview of the legal provisions detailing how these provisions should be met and how improvements to the provisions can be achieved. Practical implications - This paper specifies what the provisions for professional classified clients are and facilitates a discussion on the effectiveness of these provisions. Originality/value - Addressing the legal provisions which are applicable to ‘professional classified clients’ that derive from MiFID I and II and includes a critical analysis which offers an original perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Tom Loonen & Randy Pattiselanno, 2019. "The effectiveness of MiFID provisions for professional clients: a critical review," Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 28(1), pages 1-15, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:jfrcpp:jfrc-07-2018-0103
    DOI: 10.1108/JFRC-07-2018-0103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JFRC-07-2018-0103/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JFRC-07-2018-0103/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/JFRC-07-2018-0103?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jfrcpp:jfrc-07-2018-0103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.