IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/jfrcpp/jfrc-07-2016-0055.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prospects of an online dispute resolution framework for Islamic Banks in Malaysia

Author

Listed:
  • Umar A. Oseni
  • Sodiq O. Omoola

Abstract

Purpose - This study aims to examine the prospects of using an online dispute resolution (ODR) platform for resolving relevant Islamic banking disputes in the usual banker–customer relationship in Malaysia. It is argued that through proper regulation, such innovative dispute management mechanism would not only address some legal risks associated with banking disputes but could also prevent reputational risks in the Islamic financial services industry. Design/methodology/approach - Based on an internet survey, responses were obtained from about 109 respondents in Malaysia. The data obtained were subjected to multivariate statistical analyses considering factors such as access to justice, attitude of stakeholders, resolving disputes, practical issues and understanding of ODR. Findings - The results obtained showed that “access to justice”, “attitude of stakeholders” and “resolving disputes” are the most influencing factors affecting the intention to use ODR among stakeholders, particularly customers and bankers in the Islamic financial services industry in Malaysia. Practical implications - This study provides a way in which the recently introduced Islamic Financial Services (Financial Ombudsman Scheme) Regulations 2015 can be better enhanced to cater for internet banking disputes which might require an ODR framework. Originality/value - Though there have been numerous studies on the dispute resolution framework in the Islamic banking industry in Malaysia generally, the current study focuses on a less explored framework – ODR– a new framework for handling banking disputes.

Suggested Citation

  • Umar A. Oseni & Sodiq O. Omoola, 2017. "Prospects of an online dispute resolution framework for Islamic Banks in Malaysia," Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 25(1), pages 39-55, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:jfrcpp:jfrc-07-2016-0055
    DOI: 10.1108/JFRC-07-2016-0055
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JFRC-07-2016-0055/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JFRC-07-2016-0055/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/JFRC-07-2016-0055?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Riaz, Samina & Khan, Muhammad Irfan & Iqbal, Athar, 2018. "Risk Management Practices and Islamic Bankers’ Perception about Potential Risk in Islamic Countries," MPRA Paper 103103, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 20 Dec 2018.
    2. David Adeabah & Charles Andoh & Simplice Asongu & Albert Gemegah, 2023. "Reputational risks in banks: A review of research themes, frameworks, methods, and future research directions," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 321-350, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jfrcpp:jfrc-07-2016-0055. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.