IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/jfrcpp/13581980610659521.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Question of legal nature of betting scheme under FSMA 2000 considered by Court of Appeal

Author

Listed:
  • Joanna Gray

Abstract

Purpose - To provide a summary of the action against Top Bet Placement Services, involving a betting scheme that infringed FSMA 2000. Design/methodology/approach - A detailed exposition of the factual background to this action, including an explanation of how it changed its structure and operations over time in order to attempt to allay concerns about infringements of FSMA 2000. Findings - From the facts that have emerged in this case that sollcitors and counsel were involved throughout this scheme's existence and those concerned, including FSA, appear to have gone to considerable lengths to clarify where exactly this betting scheme fitted into the FSMA legislative framework and how. Originality/value - Case law on the meaning of the terms used in scoping out the definition of “collective investment scheme” is thin on the ground.

Suggested Citation

  • Joanna Gray, 2006. "Question of legal nature of betting scheme under FSMA 2000 considered by Court of Appeal," Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 14(2), pages 217-221, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:eme:jfrcpp:13581980610659521
    DOI: 10.1108/13581980610659521
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/13581980610659521/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/13581980610659521/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/13581980610659521?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Law; Legal decisions;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jfrcpp:13581980610659521. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.