Author
Abstract
Purpose - – The purposes of this paper are threefold. First, it aims to argue normatively how Shari’ah precepts governingTakafuloperations are translated into (rightfully) different accounting and reporting ofTakafuloperators. Second, it provides a critical review of the available and applicable accounting and reporting standards and guidelines related toTakafulin the Malaysian context. The third objective which constitutes the empirical piece of this paper centred on the basic numerical evidence obtained from the survey of final-year accounting students with regards to their ability in identifying the basic (dis)similarities in accounting and reporting betweenTakafuland insurance based on the published financial statements. Design/methodology/approach - – A mixed-mode research approach was adopted covering archival document reviews and focused group survey. Findings - – Findings are arguably informative and relevant to diverse stakeholders. First, the missing jigsaw puzzle representing accounting and reporting in theTakafulliterature is uncovered by extending the explanations ofTakaful-insurance conceptual and operational differences to that of accounting and reporting. The essence primarily lies on the different operational set-up attributed to the elements of gharar, maisir and riba. Second, the comparative analysis of accounting and reporting rules indicates that AAOIFI standards are less detailed in terms of accounting treatment over certain areas ofTakafuloperations (e.g. Re-Takaful), but these are more holistic, focused and specific in some other relatively important reporting areas reflecting the unique nature ofTakafuloperations. Third, findings based on the MalaysianTakafulaccounting and reporting guideline suggest that accounting and reporting betweenTakafuland insurance are perceived to be a coin having monographic characteristics on both sides. Originality/value - – The research explicitly extends and highlights the impact of Shari’ah precepts governingTakaful’s operational nature on its accounting and reporting. It also provides empirical evidence on the nature of Malaysian-basedTakafulaccounting and reporting guidelines which mirror its insurance counterpart.
Suggested Citation
Hairul Suhaimi Nahar, 2015.
"Insurance vsTakaful: identical sides of a coin?,"
Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(2), pages 247-266, October.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:jfrapp:v:13:y:2015:i:2:p:247-266
DOI: 10.1108/JFRA-02-2015-0029
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jfrapp:v:13:y:2015:i:2:p:247-266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.