Author
Listed:
- Peni Nugraheni
- Hairul Azlan Anuar
Abstract
Purpose - – The purpose of this paper is to investigate and compare the extent of voluntary disclosure in the annual reports ofShariah- and non–Shariah-compliant companies in Indonesia. Further, the study examines the relationship between voluntary disclosure and company characteristics (i.e. size of company, profitability, type of auditor, type of industry and ownership structure). Design/methodology/approach - – Voluntary disclosure was measured using a disclosure index with 30 items and content analysis of the 2009 annual report. Statistical analysis included descriptive, Mann–Whitney U and regression. Findings - – The result revealed that there is a statistically significant difference in the quantity and quality of voluntary disclosure value ofShariah- and non–Shariah-compliant companies. For regression results, the company size significantly influences the quantity of voluntary disclosure while the quality of voluntary disclosure is affected by company size and type of industry. Research limitations/implications - – Although this study only analyses voluntary disclosure in the annual report for a single year (2009), it is hoped to provide a description of the voluntary disclosure inShariah- and non–Shariah-compliant companies. Practical implications - – The findings might be used by regulators to set regulations that encourage the quantity and quality of disclosure practice ofShariah-compliant companies to expand the scope of disclosure related to religious activities. Originality/value - – This study measures voluntary disclosure using the disclosure index based on Indonesian regulations and the quantity and quality measurement ofShariah-compliant companies, which may differ from previous Indonesian studies.
Suggested Citation
Peni Nugraheni & Hairul Azlan Anuar, 2014.
"Implications ofShariahon the voluntary disclosure of Indonesian listed companies,"
Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(1), pages 76-98, July.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:jfrapp:v:12:y:2014:i:1:p:76-98
DOI: 10.1108/JFRA-11-2011-0018
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jfrapp:v:12:y:2014:i:1:p:76-98. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.