IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/jfeppp/jfep-03-2019-0063.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reputational risk management in conditions of credibility gap in the banking system

Author

Listed:
  • Karyna Trostianska
  • Ilona Semencha

Abstract

Purpose - This paper aims to provide appropriate and effective methods for diagnosing and managing the reputational risk of a bank. Design/methodology/approach - Using the data-mining system CONFOR, the authors have defined and arranged in the objective way the factors influencing the reputational risk level of a bank, with specific factor groups assigned. The mathematical tools of the theory of graphs and cognitive mapping are used for building the cognitive map of reputational risk assessment of a bank. To enable choosing which risk management strategies to use, the methods of impulse modeling and scenario analysis are applied for the purpose of prognostication. Findings - The authors proposed an integrated approach to the objective determination of the reputational risk level and an easy-to-use choice of risk management scenarios considering all components of management decision making and the main managerial functions. Practical implications - The range of tools proposed can be used as a simple measure of the bank's reputational risk level, as a component of risk management model, and as a strategic risk management tool. Implementing this approach at the level of the central bank will facilitate realization of its strategic program for restoring confidence in the banking system as a whole. Originality/value - A relatively greater objectivity in the reputational risk assessment of the bank was achieved, with each stage formalized and confirmed by an economic and mathematical basis, risk parameters quantified. The authors have developed a comprehensive approach to the reputational risk level assessment (the integral assessment included) as well as the management algorithm.

Suggested Citation

  • Karyna Trostianska & Ilona Semencha, 2019. "Reputational risk management in conditions of credibility gap in the banking system," Journal of Financial Economic Policy, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(3), pages 327-343, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:jfeppp:jfep-03-2019-0063
    DOI: 10.1108/JFEP-03-2019-0063
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JFEP-03-2019-0063/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JFEP-03-2019-0063/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/JFEP-03-2019-0063?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David Adeabah & Charles Andoh & Simplice Asongu & Albert Gemegah, 2023. "Reputational risks in banks: A review of research themes, frameworks, methods, and future research directions," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 321-350, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Cognitive map of reputational risk assessment; Reputational risk; Reputational risk assessment; Reputational risk level; Reputational risk management; Scenario analysis; C89; D81; G21;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C89 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Other
    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jfeppp:jfep-03-2019-0063. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.