IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/jfcpps/jfc-10-2023-0282.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transparency and budget savings in public procurement: evidence from Thailand’s Infrastructure Transparency Initiative (CoST)

Author

Listed:
  • Tippatrai Saelawong
  • Torplus Yomnak
  • Thanee Chaiwat
  • Siwat Poopunpanich
  • Charoen Sutuktis

Abstract

Purpose - This study evaluates the effect of transparency measures on public procurement efficiency, focusing on Thailand’s Infrastructure Transparency Initiative (CoST). This study aims to understand its impact on the country’s public infrastructure procurement practices. Design/methodology/approach - This paper analyses Thailand’s government construction procurement data, focusing on budgetary savings and CoST process participation. Budgetary savings are this study dependent variable, while the main intervention variable is the adoption of the CoST data disclosure standard. This study uses multiple linear regression, fixed-effects model and propensity score matching with the logit model for a comprehensive analysis. Findings - This study shows that using the CoST data disclosure leads to notable budget savings in Thai public construction procurement. With CoST’s introduction, the savings rose by Baht 9.6m, and even with added controls, the savings remained significant at around Baht 3.3m. The savings consistently stay near 5% across different models. The propensity score matching method confirms these results, consistent with factors such as open bidding and agency categorisation. Research limitations/implications - This study might not capture all benefits, especially non-financial ones. Thailand’s unique context and potential biases in data sources also need consideration. Practical implications - CoST evidence backs Thailand’s procurement transparency. This study recommends broadening CoST, streamlining online platforms and promoting digital public engagement. Training stakeholders and partnering with state-owned enterprises and local agencies is vital to align with CoST and mitigate risks. Originality/value - This study shows a clear link between transparency from information disclosure and budget efficiency in public procurement, using data from Thailand. It highlights the potential of transparency measures in developing countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Tippatrai Saelawong & Torplus Yomnak & Thanee Chaiwat & Siwat Poopunpanich & Charoen Sutuktis, 2023. "Transparency and budget savings in public procurement: evidence from Thailand’s Infrastructure Transparency Initiative (CoST)," Journal of Financial Crime, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 31(6), pages 1407-1419, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:eme:jfcpps:jfc-10-2023-0282
    DOI: 10.1108/JFC-10-2023-0282
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JFC-10-2023-0282/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JFC-10-2023-0282/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/JFC-10-2023-0282?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jfcpps:jfc-10-2023-0282. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.