Mapping geographic patterns in federal corporate agreements

Purpose - The purpose of this study is to use crime mapping techniques to examine geographic patterns of signed deferred and non-prosecution agreements across federal districts. The purpose is also to examine the variation in the number of agreements by the district since 1992. Design/methodology/approach - This study uses data from the Corporate Prosecution Registry to examine geographic patterns in federal corporate agreements since 1992 (n= 534). Choropleth mapping techniques were used to create national crime maps displaying the geographic locations of signed corporate agreements. Findings - The results showed that, overall, prosecutors in the District of Columbia have signed the most federal corporate agreements although there is some variation over time. Research limitations/implications - This study is unable to determine the causes of changes in the geographic placement or number of agreements signed. It is also unable to determine the precise geographic locations of crimes, but only the location of the District Court that elected to pursue a federal agreement with the organization. Practical implications - The wide discretion prosecutors have in the agreement process has led to an overall lack of transparency concerning prosecutors’ decision-making when signing agreements with organizations. This study helps to make the number and geographic location of agreements more transparent. Originality/value - This study uses crime mapping techniques to visually depict the locations of signed agreements allowing for visual comparisons and analyzes for an extended period of time.