IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/jecpps/jec-08-2022-0116.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing citizen science ecosystem: critical factors for quadruple helix stakeholders engagement

Author

Listed:
  • Aelita Skarzauskiene
  • Monika Maciuliene
  • Sabine Wildevuur
  • Maya van den Berg
  • Thomas Bakratsas
  • Artemis Psaltoglou
  • Efstratios Stylianidis
  • Ioannis Tavantzis
  • Kostas Karatzas

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to provide answers regarding the factors that motivate or discourage the quadruple helix (QH) stakeholders and the wider public in citizen science (CS) activities. The research reveals a current overview of the perceptions, attitudes, concerns and motivation with regard to development of CS ecosystem in four countries: Greece, Lithuania, the Netherlands and Spain. Design/methodology/approach - The researchers deploy a mixed methodology, entailing an in-depth literature review and a large-scale quantitative survey (approximately 2,000 citizens) targeting QH stakeholders and general public from the local national ecosystems. The results contain both descriptive statistics and statistical analysis per country. After the comprehensive overview of drivers and barriers regarding the participation in CS activities in general, the focus is narrowed down on the engagement motivation of different QH stakeholders and the differences in enabling/hindering factors at the local ecosystems. Findings - Depending on the country and the pre-existing level of CS maturity, the results provide a complicated network of factors that unlock or block participation in CS activities. These factors include, to name a few, political maturity, civic engagement, technological infrastructures, economic growth, culture of stakeholder collaboration, psychological stimulus and surplus of resources. The implications of the findings necessitate the alignment of the envisioned CS ecosystem with the local dynamics in each country. Research limitations/implications - The quantitative nature of the survey method, limited sample size and only four countries context are noted as limitations of the study and offer future research potential for longitudinal settings and mixed-methods studies. Originality/value - The results contribute to the wider literature on CS that focuses on perspectives, possibilities and differences in local contexts with respect to the public engagement by developing CS ecosystem. At the same time, its added value lies in the overall practical proposition, and how the latter can effectively and efficiently attract and retain different stakeholder groups and citizens, under a collaborative approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Aelita Skarzauskiene & Monika Maciuliene & Sabine Wildevuur & Maya van den Berg & Thomas Bakratsas & Artemis Psaltoglou & Efstratios Stylianidis & Ioannis Tavantzis & Kostas Karatzas, 2023. "Developing citizen science ecosystem: critical factors for quadruple helix stakeholders engagement," Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 19(1), pages 111-133, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:jecpps:jec-08-2022-0116
    DOI: 10.1108/JEC-08-2022-0116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JEC-08-2022-0116/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JEC-08-2022-0116/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/JEC-08-2022-0116?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jecpps:jec-08-2022-0116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.