IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/jebdep/jebde-10-2022-0039.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An ecosystem approach to Web3.0: a systematic review and research agenda

Author

Listed:
  • Chong Guan
  • Ding Ding
  • Jiancang Guo
  • Yun Teng

Abstract

Purpose - This paper reviews the extant research on Web3.0 published between 2003 and 2022. Design/methodology/approach - This study uses a topic modeling procedure latent Dirichlet allocation to uncover the research themes and the key phrases associated with each theme. Findings - This study uncovers seven research themes that have been featured in the existing research. In particular, the study highlights the interaction among the research themes that contribute to the understanding of a number of solutions, applications and use cases, such as metaverse and non-fungible tokens. Research limitations/implications - Despite the relatively small data size of the study, the results remain significant as they contribute to a more profound comprehension of the relevant field and offer guidance for future research directions. The previous analysis revealed that the current Web3.0 technology is still encountering several challenges. Building upon the pioneering research in the field of blockchain, decentralized networks, smart contracts and algorithms, the study proposes an exploratory agenda for future research from an ecosystem approach, targeting to enhance the current state of affairs. Originality/value - Although topics around Web3.0 have been discussed intensively among the crypto community and technological enthusiasts, there is limited research that provides a comprehensive description of all the related issues and an in-depth analysis of their real-world implications from an ecosystem perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Chong Guan & Ding Ding & Jiancang Guo & Yun Teng, 2023. "An ecosystem approach to Web3.0: a systematic review and research agenda," Journal of Electronic Business & Digital Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 2(1), pages 139-156, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:jebdep:jebde-10-2022-0039
    DOI: 10.1108/JEBDE-10-2022-0039
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JEBDE-10-2022-0039/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JEBDE-10-2022-0039/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/JEBDE-10-2022-0039?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jebdep:jebde-10-2022-0039. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.