Author
Listed:
- Andrews Osei-Bonsu
- Anselm Komla Abotsi
- Emmanuel Carsamer
Abstract
Purpose - The Ghanaian insurance industry has been transformed significantly from state-led to a market-driven one over the past decades. The empirical literature on the causal relationship between insurance and economic growth has been mixed, but little study on this has been done in Ghana. This study therefore empirically examines the effect of the growing insurance industry on the economic growth in Ghana. Design/methodology/approach - Quantitative research design was deployed in the study. The study used Johansen–Juselius cointegration test and vector error correction model. The study deployed quarterly data from the first quarter of 2006 to the second quarter of 2018 sourced from the World Bank (World Development Indicators), National Insurance Commission, Ghana Statistical Service and Bank of Ghana. Findings - Findings revealed that there is a significant and positive short and long-run relationship between insurance and economic growth in Ghana, bidirectional causality between insurance and economic growth and also a long-run effect of innovations (shocks) in insurance on economic growth. Research limitations/implications - One of the limitations of the study is the unavailability of quarterly data of some of the variables. Practical implications - The study recommends the development and implementation of policies that promote an increase in coverage and access to insurance products to enhance economic growth. Originality/value - The study finds a bidirectional causality running from insurance premium to economic growth and from economic growth to insurance which is consistent with the feedback hypothesis in the case of Ghana. Impulse response functions and the variance decompositions revealed that innovation (shock) in the insurance industry has a positive impact on economic growth.
Suggested Citation
Andrews Osei-Bonsu & Anselm Komla Abotsi & Emmanuel Carsamer, 2021.
"Insurance and economic growth in Ghana,"
Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 38(3), pages 397-416, March.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:jeaspp:jeas-09-2020-0158
DOI: 10.1108/JEAS-09-2020-0158
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jeaspp:jeas-09-2020-0158. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.