Author
Listed:
- Ibrahim Abaasi Musenze
- Thomas Sifuna Mayende
- Ahmed Jowalie Wampande
- Joseph Kasango
- Ongario Ronald Emojong
Abstract
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore the relationship between perceived organizational support (POS) and work engagement and the mediating effect of self-efficacy on the POS–work engagement relationship. Design/methodology/approach - A questionnaire survey was developed and distributed to a sample of primary school teachers drawn from the education industry. Findings - Analysis of the data supports a strong positive relationship between the extent of POS and work engagement. This study also found that self-efficacy mediated the relationship between POS and work engagement. Research limitations/implications - This study has important implications for managers. First, it motivates managers, by providing justification for provision of support to employees for increased engagement at work. Based on the results of this study, POS is associated with enhanced work engagement levels. Second, evidence from this study illustrates to the organization the importance of developing an environment of support to further enhance work engagement. When employees do not acknowledge and feel supported from their respective organizations, work engagement levels may be sub-optimal. This research is limited, as the data were collected at one point of time, and this has implications for employees and organizations. Originality/value - There is increasing recognition of the importance of POS in enhanced work engagement levels. Within this context, no previous research has empirically examined the mediating effect of self-efficacy on the relationship between POS and work engagement in the setting of primary education sector.
Suggested Citation
Ibrahim Abaasi Musenze & Thomas Sifuna Mayende & Ahmed Jowalie Wampande & Joseph Kasango & Ongario Ronald Emojong, 2020.
"Mechanism between perceived organizational support and work engagement: explanatory role of self-efficacy,"
Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 37(4), pages 471-495, October.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:jeaspp:jeas-02-2020-0016
DOI: 10.1108/JEAS-02-2020-0016
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jeaspp:jeas-02-2020-0016. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.