Author
Abstract
Purpose - – The purpose of this study is to examine the usefulness of derivative disclosures from the perspective of Chinese institutional investors in relation to their investment decision-making. Design/methodology/approach - – This study uses semi-structured interviews with 21 institutional investors based in China including 10 funds managers and 11 professional analysts. Findings - – This study finds that the information on the use of derivatives disclosed by listed companies in China is generally perceived to be useful to Chinese institutional investors (e.g. funds managers and professional analysts) in facilitating their investment decisions, although such information is generally thought to be less significant compared to other fundamental financial information such as assets, liabilities and profits/losses. It also finds that the current provisions of derivatives-related information by Chinese listed companies are largely unsatisfied primarily because of insufficient information and the lack of timely disclosures. Furthermore, it finds that the accounting and reporting policies currently imposed in China appear to be little understood by Chinese investors. Research limitations/implications - – This study has its own limitations due to the approach of interviews with a relatively small sample from only two investment firms in China. Practical implications - – The findings from the study provide a number of policy implications for derivatives regulators and accounting standards setters. Originality/value - – This study is the first study of its kind to investigate the perceptions of Chinese institutional investors on the usefulness of derivatives reporting and disclosures with the use of interview research method.
Suggested Citation
Zhen Huang & Simon Gao, 2014.
"The usefulness of derivative disclosures for investment decision-making,"
Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 7(3), pages 173-192, October.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:jcefts:v:7:y:2014:i:3:p:173-192
DOI: 10.1108/JCEFTS-02-2015-0009
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jcefts:v:7:y:2014:i:3:p:173-192. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.