Author
Listed:
- Mohsen Bahmani-Oskooee
- Scott Hegerty
- Ruixin Zhang
Abstract
Purpose - – Recent years have seen a rapid expansion of studies that examine the effects of exchange-rate risk on bilateral exports and imports for specific industries. Since the underlying theory is ambiguous, each case must be studied individually. This paper considers British trade with China, for 47 types of product, over the period from 1978 to 2010. Consistent with the underlying theory, cointegration analysis shows that most industries register no effect due to volatility in the long run, while some trade flows are reduced and a handful are even increased. An analysis of industry characteristics suggests that while the type of good might play little role on an industry's specific results, a product's trade share does. This is the case for UK imports of Chinese goods, perhaps because large Chinese exporters are able to successfully hedge against exchange-rate risk. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach - – The method is based on bounds testing approach to cointegration and error-correction modeling. Findings - – The paper arrives at two key conclusions. First, as has been shown previously for other country pairs, most industries demonstrate no long-run response to exchange-rate volatility. A fraction of industries are affected, and most of these effects are negative. Research limitations/implications - – This research pertains to the case of industry trade between the UK and China only. Practical implications - – The paper identifies industries that are affected by exchange rate uncertainty. Originality/value - – No study has looked at the impact of exchange rate uncertainty on the trade flows between China and the UK at commodity level.
Suggested Citation
Mohsen Bahmani-Oskooee & Scott Hegerty & Ruixin Zhang, 2014.
"Exchange-rate risk and UK-China trade: evidence from 47 industries,"
Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 7(1), pages 2-17, January.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:jcefts:v:7:y:2014:i:1:p:2-17
DOI: 10.1108/JCEFTS-04-2013-0011
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jcefts:v:7:y:2014:i:1:p:2-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.