IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/jcefts/v3y2010i1p43-53.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are the forces that cause China's trade surplus with the USA good?

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan E. Leightner

Abstract

Purpose - This paper aims to conceptually argue that China's trade surplus with the USA is not good. Design/methodology/approach - Net exporters (like China) give up current consumption in order to gain claims against future production. This paper argues that the reasons why China is trading current consumption for claims on future production are not good. Findings - There are strong reasons to believe that China's trade surplus with the USA is not healthy for either China or the USA. Originality/value - Other scholars have discussed the trading of the present for the future that is involved in trade surpluses, but no one (to the author's knowledge) has discussed when such a trade is good or bad.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan E. Leightner, 2010. "Are the forces that cause China's trade surplus with the USA good?," Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 3(1), pages 43-53, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:eme:jcefts:v:3:y:2010:i:1:p:43-53
    DOI: 10.1108/17544401011016672
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/17544401011016672/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/17544401011016672/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/17544401011016672?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jcefts:v:3:y:2010:i:1:p:43-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.