IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/jbsedp/jbsed-03-2021-0023.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Political ties and corporate performance: why efficiency matters?

Author

Listed:
  • Rabia Najaf
  • Khakan Najaf

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine and explain the complex interrelationships which influence the performance of politically connected firms to create value for their providers of finance and other stakeholders. In doing so, it examines the interrelationships between efficiency and delivering on corporate performance of a firm with political ties. Design/methodology/approach - The authors gathered the literature from the Scopus website. They reviewed the literature of 58 manuscripts about the efficiency and performance of politically connected firms. Findings - The research finds that the better quality of efficiency of politically connected firms is positively related to the corporate performance of politically connected firms. The authors’ theoretical findings corroborate the political theory, agency theory, stakeholder theory, resource dependency theory and stewardship theory. These theories prove that political connections have an impact on firm performance as a politician reinforces the efficacy. To better understand the effect of political connections on solid performance due to efficiency, this study classifies various efficiencies and links them with political ties. Research limitations/implications - Several avenues of research are suggested to examine further the interrelationships identified. Practical implications - The authors’ conceptual findings are valuable for institutional investors, policymakers and stakeholders. To sum up, all theoretical shreds of evidence prove that politically connected firms can enhance performance via efficiency. Originality/value - The paper conceptualizes the efficiency and performance interrelationships of politically connected firms. The extant literature comparison allows an assessment of the extent to which different efficiency contexts lead to differences in performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Rabia Najaf & Khakan Najaf, 2021. "Political ties and corporate performance: why efficiency matters?," Journal of Business and Socio-economic Development, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 1(2), pages 182-196, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:jbsedp:jbsed-03-2021-0023
    DOI: 10.1108/JBSED-03-2021-0023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JBSED-03-2021-0023/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JBSED-03-2021-0023/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/JBSED-03-2021-0023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mustafa Avcın, 2024. "The impact of justified corporate governance changes against exchange rate exposure in North Cyprus," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(2), pages 1947-1971, April.
    2. Cai, Lingnan, 2023. "Equity incentive, political connection and bank loan in private enterprises," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    3. Muhammad Arsalan Hashmi & Abdullah & Rayenda Khresna Brahmana, 2022. "Family monitoring and the adverse consequences of political connections: does it vary over family generations?," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 46(6), pages 832-851, September.
    4. Lu, Zhiqiang & Li, Hongyu, 2023. "Does environmental information disclosure affect green innovation?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 47-59.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jbsedp:jbsed-03-2021-0023. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.