IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/jaocpp/jaoc-01-2012-0006.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Think (not so) straight, talk (not so) straight

Author

Listed:
  • Timothy J. Fogarty

Abstract

Purpose - This paper aims to provide an analysis of the choices Arthur Andersen faced in dealing with the crisis that ultimately let to its downfall in 2001-2002. Design/methodology/approach - The paper is built around institutional theory. Specifically, it applies the propositions provided by Oliver (1990, 1991) to the historical record. Findings - The failure to develop a coherent response, combined with a failure to anticipate the specific role of the state led to Andersen’s inability to navigate the institutional field. Research limitations/implications - The usual limitations of institutional theory are acknowledged. These pertain to the lack of a micro-level analysis, the additional impact of pure economic rationality and the chance that every crisis of faith is unique. Practical implications - The article adds to our appreciation of what not to do in the face of crisis by the government and those in charge of large accounting organizations. Social implications - The article adds to the recently in the news “too big to fail” problem with successful economic agents. Originality/value - The article adds to institutional theory by providing a different story than the usual, where everything is cleverly managed and the crisis is overcome.

Suggested Citation

  • Timothy J. Fogarty, 2015. "Think (not so) straight, talk (not so) straight," Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(1), pages 73-95, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eme:jaocpp:jaoc-01-2012-0006
    DOI: 10.1108/JAOC-01-2012-0006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JAOC-01-2012-0006/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JAOC-01-2012-0006/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/JAOC-01-2012-0006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jaocpp:jaoc-01-2012-0006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.