IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/jaeepp/jaee-11-2020-0292.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Taking stock and moving forward: a systematic literature review on accounting professionalisation in China, 1980–2021

Author

Listed:
  • Wenjun Wen

Abstract

Purpose - This paper aims to review the research on accounting professionalisation in China to develop insights into how the research is developing, offer a critique of the research to date and outline future research directions and opportunities. Design/methodology/approach - This paper adopts a methodological approach of systematic literature review, as suggested by Tranfieldet al.(2003) and Denyer and Tranfield (2009), to identify, select and analyse the extant literature on the Chinese public accounting profession. In total, 68 academic works were included in the review process. Findings - This paper finds that the extant literature has produced fruitful insights into the processes and underlying motivation of accounting professionalisation in China, demonstrating that the Chinese experience has differed, to a large extent, from the hitherto mainly Anglo-American-dominated understandings of accounting professionalisation. However, due to the lack of common theoretical vernacular and an agreed upon focus, the extant literature illustrates a fragmented and contradictory picture, making attempts to accumulate prior knowledge in the field increasingly difficult. Research limitations/implications - This paper focusses only on research published in English. Consequently, the scope of review has been limited as some works published in languages other than English may be excluded. Originality/value - This paper provides one of the pioneering exercises to systematically review the research on accounting professionalisation in China. It explores significant issues arising from the analysis and provides several suggestions for furthering the research effort in this field.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenjun Wen, 2021. "Taking stock and moving forward: a systematic literature review on accounting professionalisation in China, 1980–2021," Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(2), pages 238-278, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:jaeepp:jaee-11-2020-0292
    DOI: 10.1108/JAEE-11-2020-0292
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JAEE-11-2020-0292/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JAEE-11-2020-0292/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/JAEE-11-2020-0292?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jaeepp:jaee-11-2020-0292. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.